Jump to content

Martyn Houghton

Hornbill Users
  • Posts

    4,014
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    86

Everything posted by Martyn Houghton

  1. @Art at BU This indeed an example of what we are asking the enhancement to enable use to do. Cheers Martyn
  2. @yelyah.nodrog I am sure this has come up before, but +++++1 for us as well. I try to see if I can find the previous post(s). Cheers Martyn
  3. @will.good I do not believe you can delete a contact through he main application, only Archive them. The only way to delete a contact is via the Hornbill Clean utility. https://wiki.hornbill.com/index.php/Hornbill_Clean_Utility Cheers Martyn
  4. @Malcolm Collaboration (Platform) licenses will show on the first 'Usage' tab. Clicking on the Service Manager total will show you all the users who have a license. You may have exceeded it by more than just one Cheers Martyn
  5. @Malcolm In Solution Center > Usage > Application Subscriptions does it show as all allocated against Service Manager entry? Cheers Martyn <==
  6. @CraigP A request needs to come off hold for the timers to be restarted so that when you resolve it the timers have already recalculated the Respond By/Resolve By values, else you will get incorrect SLA performance values. You can do a bulk Update on requests under the same service from the Request List view, but it will depend on what BPM suspect node you have in your workflow as to whether this will then unpause the request. Cheers Martyn
  7. @Malcolm As a fellow Customer Portal user, what setting value do you have this now set to? We have our set to 14400. Cheers Martyn
  8. @ssimpson I suspect at the moment it does not honour time zones and DST, but we did not get a definitive answer when we raised this last year. Cheers Martyn
  9. @James Ainsworth From a security point of view having it controlled by a BPM Node from a change request would so it is tracked and controlled would in essence be an improvement. Is there an audit trail we can check when these settings are currently modified manually? Cheers Martyn
  10. Related to my other post about implementing Change Control for simple lists, we are also looking to implement the same for setting up of new Contacts. With the current limited customer data model, we do have to create contacts with duplicate email addresses sometimes, so we need to manage the Platform> Core Settings> app.view.contact.disableEmailDuplicateValidation to allow for these exceptions. We would like to automate this as part of the Change Request, so can we query whether it is currently possible to update Hornbill Settings via a BPM node? Cheers Martyn
  11. We are looking to implement Change Control around the management of Simple Lists. We make very heavy use of Simple Lists in both our IC and BPM processes, so their correct management is critical to the operation of the service. Can we enquire if it is currently possible to Add and Remove a Simple List Entry via a BPM node, as we would like the CR request to actually undertake the change the Simple List? Cheers Martyn
  12. @Berto2002 Agree the new autosave 'feature' is not that intuitive and we too add multiple lines at a time. Previously you could do this and then click on each line in term to commit the changes. Cheers Martyn
  13. Can we request an enhancement for the Intelligent Capture custom expression builder to be able to access the custom fields for the Customers (Contact) for use in the branch conditions? At the moment their is only limited fields made visible and we hold additional information such as skill matrix against the customer to determine if they are entitled to log a request against the service. Cheers Martyn
  14. @QEHNick Have you also got enough Service Manager licenses as well as Collaboration (User) ones? Cheers Martyn
  15. @Jim This also causes us a manual step to check who else the email address was sent to. When Auto Logging a request from an email we include in the email the node to get the email to: addresses and insert them into the timeline as part of the workflow. However this only works for the initial email that triggers the request to be logged. Cheers Martyn
  16. Not sure if it is just our instance, but Service Manger 2830 released yesterday did not get applied to our system in this morning's maintenance window. @Harry Hornbill is that expected or should we raise a support request for our instance? Cheers Martyn
  17. @James Ainsworth Build 215 does appear to have resolved the issue but KE00174615 is not referenced in the release notes. Cheers Martyn
  18. Can we raise an enhancement request for the Linked Request section to have a request type filter like that of the Request List and a text filter as well, as this will make it easier to locate linked requests on those which have a large volume of them linked? Cheers Martyn
  19. @James Ainsworth Service Manager 2809 has been applied to our instance but the issue perisists. Was this supposed to be fixed in this build? Cheers Martyn
×
×
  • Create New...