Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'filter'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Hornbill Platform and Applications
    • OpenForWork
    • Announcements
    • Blog Article Discussions
    • General Non-Product Discussions
    • Application Beta Program
    • Collaboration
    • Employee Portal
    • Service Manager
    • IT Operations Management
    • Project Manager
    • Supplier Manager
    • Customer Manager
    • Document Manager
    • Timesheet Manager
    • Live Chat
    • Board Manager
    • Mobile Apps
    • System Administration
    • Integration Connectors, API & Webhooks
    • Performance Analytics
    • Hornbill Switch On & Implementation Questions
    • GRC Manager
  • About the Forum
    • Announcements
    • Suggestions and Feedback
    • Problems and Questions
  • Gamers Club's Games
  • Gamers Club's LFT

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Organisation


Location


Interests


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype

  1. When chasing up change control, we create an activity for the user to undertake the change, which then expired after 24 hours before we email then again and create a new activity (thus triggering notifications/email etc). The activities show correctly on the Service Manager requests, but when you go into the main 'Activities' view you see both the current one and all the previous ones which are have expired. Should this not just display the current un-expired activities? Cheers Martyn
  2. Is there a way of showing if a change is a Normal, Emergency or Standard change in the request list view, we cannot seem to find a way of displaying this information? How do others work with changes in the request list? Kind regards Jeremy
  3. When users have a large number of Assets they use or are shared with them, the current 'Link Asset' screen can become somewhat cumbersome to locate the correct asset, whilst the the current Search option does not help given that it's scope is all assets. Can we request an enhancement to add in a Filter option on both the 'Used By' and 'Shared with' options, to make it easier to locate the assets linked to the current customer. Especially useful would be able to filter by state and operational state, so archived/retired assets can be excluded. It would also be useful to be able to have some control on the display order with sorting options, as not sure what order is currently applied by default. Cheers Martyn
  4. Can we request the ability have a textual filter added to the Request List widget, much like the one that is present on the user app Request List view? This will make it much easier to locate requests when the user has a large number of requests. Cheers Martyn
  5. We are looking to make use of the Asset Management feature within our progressive captures, but to do so we need to be able filter by more than just Type and Class. In our case we are going to be recording customer Software installations as assets, so we would need the ability to filter by the Product field, so we can display a list of all software assets of a certain product associated with the customer. Can a SQL where like filter option be provide to make this generic to allow for all sites different class definitions? This would make the use of the Assets Management element much easier to customise for each customers requirements, as well as enabling it for it to be used for more than just the traditional IT Service. Cheers Martyn
  6. When you have a large number of requests in the Employee Portal it would be a real help to have a filter option within the widget, much the same as there is in the main application Request List. Cheers Martyn
  7. Hi Despite being able to show Department on the request list, it is missing from the advanced filter. Kind regards, Carl
  8. Can we request an enhancement to the 'Linked Request' BPM node, in that there is an option to limit which linked requests are updated by request type. In our scenario we are implementing Problem Management and will want to use the node to update/resolve the Incidents linked to the Problem request. However there may be other Problem, Release, Change, Known Errors etc linked to the same request which we would not want to update/resolve. Therefore can we ask for the filter option on both Update and Resolve Linked Requests so that it can be done by 'Request Type', i.e. we need to be a bit more precise in only updating the linked incidents and not everything else it may be related to. Cheers Martyn
  9. At the moment the Change Calendar show All Requests, My Requests and My Services. It would be useful to filter it by Service Category, similar to the Service Portfolio, as well as have the ability for a free text filter to search the main summary, description, owner, customer, site, organisation etc. Cheers Martyn
  10. to make life easier for agents, it would be great to be able to only allow visibility of priorities which relate to the type of request (incident, request, change, problem) that has been created. Is this something anyone else has requested or something that would be considered for future development?? thanks Andy
  11. We have a ever growing list of views setup in our request list, both individual and shared. Consequently this is becoming harder and more time consuming trying to scroll down to locate a specific view. Can a Filter field be added to the View drop down covering both your own and shared views, akin to the one on Team drop down, so it easier to get to the view you want more easily. Cheers Martyn
  12. Hi, We are currently importing various types of assets into our Service Manager instance. We have found that, when logging an incident/service request via the customer portal, all types of assets are presented to the customer - including servers, switches etc. We would like to be able to filter out certain asset types on the portal, via the "asset details" out of the box form, so that only those relevant to the end user are presented. Is there any way that this can be achieved? I've looked within the "Asset Management" section of Service Manager and cannot see anywhere that this would be set. Thanks Lauren
  13. Where you have a large number of contacts set within an organisation for access via the customer portal, the current Portal Access screen can be somewhat of a pain to navigate and locate the account given that it does not appear to be sorted at all at the moment. Would it be possible to have the ability to filter on the portal access screen fields, as well as sort by contact name, 'Can Cancel' and 'Organisation View'. Thanks Martyn
  14. We use a large number of #Simple List' as sources for list in progressive capture and custom fields, so it would be really useful to have a Filter/Search facility in the Admin Tool for Service Manager > Simple Lists. Also presume this would be useful in the other 'Simple Lists' for the others Apps as well. Cheers Martyn
  15. When using the Filter in Board Manager, there is no indication of which swim lane the matches are in, so if the board card is not on the screen due to the position of the scroll bar for a swim lane containing more cards than can be displayed on the screen, you have to scroll through all the swim lanes. Could the filter indicate/highlight the swim lanes there are matches in? Cheers Martyn
  16. Thought the ability to do a global timeline search has been a great step forward, it would be useful to be able to search/filter for a term within the current request. We do have some long running requests, which have extensive timelines on them. I know you can filter by type of timeline post, but even then the number of posts can be excessive and also they will not all be expanded. Having the ability filter/search the timeline of the current request would really be useful and a lot less resource than having to use the Global search when you already know the request reference and just want to locate specific posts in the current request. At the moment I have using the Print option to generate the whole timeline in the browser and then using the find option. Cheers Martyn
  17. Hi all, My manager would like to be able to filter based on a customer's title i.e. senior members of staff/Partners. I appreciate reports can be run however this is not suitable for probing tickets. Regards, Mike.
  18. With the introduction of pagination on the measures screen in Admin tool, the filter is now only working on the records displayed on the current page and not the whole of the list. Cheers Martyn
  19. As we have created a rather larger volume of services, it would be good to have a search/filter facility on the services screen to make it easier to locate the service(s) you are trying to locate or work on. At the moment we are just using the browser search function to locate the Service we require. Cheers Martyn
  20. Hi, When reviewing asset information, I've been coming across duplicate assets. We generally use the csv import tool for new assets and assets in the computer system class have some fields automatically populated via SCCM. The duplicates seem to have been created via SCCM. I'd like to create a report in Service Manager to help me identify all duplicate entries so they can be identified and analysed further. For most of our assets the "Name" field should be unique, as well as "Asset Tag". The "name" field matches the "Asset Tag" but has a prefix. e.g. Asset Tag: 12345 Name: DC012345 Any advice on what criteria to use for the report would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
  21. Following recent updates to either the Platform or Admin Tool, existing reports where the Data Filters include textual fields with reserved characters in them are failing to return matching rows and display text the criteria is being corrupted. In our case, this is being caused by organisation names containing Ampersand '&' in organisation names. The reserved character is being 'escaped' as @amp; in the selection criteria, but each time you add another organisation to the criteria list containing an ampersand, it is duplicated again. Even without the duplicate escaped characters the reports are still not returning records for this organisation, which are present and meet the other criteria. We are also having issues when entering organisation names into user prompted criteria where the name contains an appostrify. Cheers Martyn
  22. We have a large number of OU in our AD, so I run the import from the parent level and use the Scope=2 setting to include all the sub levels. I now need to exclude just one of the OU from the LDAP import process, but even though I have added it into the filter the LDAP import process is still processing them, so I think I have something wrong in the syntax when trying to exclude an OU. (&(objectCategory=User)(!(userAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2))(!(ou=CloudAmber))) I have also tried the format ou:dn:=CloudAmber, but that does not work either. I have also tested it in reverse, i.e. trying only to import just that OU, but then get no results, so it does look like I doing something wrong in terms testing the OU value. Cheers Martyn
  23. Hello, When searching for requests the results are displayed in ascending order or SRXXX or INXXX number. It would be very useful to be able to manipulate the search results and arrange/group them by: Status, Customer, Owner, Team or Service I have read other posts regarding creating custom views when searching for requests, however this simple task should be more efficient, and easier to access. Creating a custom view each time to perform a search is rather fiddly. Thanks Gary
  24. The filter on Request List screen does not search External Reference column. It is included in the Global Request Search, but not the filter when you are in Request List itself. It would be useful to be able to have this included in the filter as sometimes customers will quote their reference and not ours. Cheers Martyn
  25. Following on from the introductions of the filter options on the request timeline, it would be good to have the ability to set your own personal filter settings which persist when opening new requests. Where as at the moment each time you open a request they reset to the All option. Cheers Martyn
×
×
  • Create New...