HHH

Yes it's a setting in the analyst's account, not through BPM I'm afraid.

+1 that would be really handy to not have to maintain an updated simple list of Services for use in some PCF's

Unfortunately our analysts have come back that this is still an issue.

+1, definitely. But AFAIK you can set up notifications for being added as a member. Members Added (Recipients Notification) in your account configuration

It would be nice to be able to make a chart for ratings but to filter out all requests where rating is not set. Is this possible or can it be made possible. The number not set is so high in relation to the ones where it's set so the scale of the chart makes the others unreadable

@ArmandoDM Resolved by applying latest update

Since today, when using the attachments form. The forms says successful upload but no attachment appears in the ticket. Does anyone else have this issue?

Slow in Firefox as well as Chrome

AFAIK this is under development, perhaps one of the developers can tell us when it's due

+1, we have several sub status within each Status, so the ability to do this would be nice.

@Martyn Houghton What happens if you ignore the custom fields rather than set them blank? Also check in Jira what the actual ID for the priorities are

it was suggested some time ago to put a 0 (zero) in the other fields.

+1 since we handle external customers sharing for example the same server

Thanks @Martyn Houghton

I stand in shame corrected

Are email template translations something that is considered for implementation?

Any update on this?

+1 to allow status changes (and sub-status) from request list

When a routing rule is matched, does the routing rule engine stop or does it continue and process the next rule in line, allowing two rules to be applied to the same email? The reason for this is I want a rule that leaves specific emails in the inbox and I don't want the next rule, "updateRequest" to be applied to them.

Is something similar possible to achieve with external organisations as well?

I'm having trouble with regards to the computed visibility of/access to catalogue items. For example, we have User A in Team A on Site A If I set User A enabled and Team A disabled, User A will have access to the CI. If I set Team A enabled and Site A disabled, User A will not have access to the CI. Is there a definite list of access overrides somewhere? I.E. Site trumps Company, User trumps Team, etc. I hope I make sense but our organisation structure is quite complex and it would help a lot clearing things up and allowing the proper people access to the CI's.

I like your idea @Martyn Houghton

We run many of our standard changes as SR within Hornbill. Having a pre defined process and a CI for it.

@Steven Boardman Following since this is a welcome addition

Looks like a caching bug. I tried to 1. go to notifications. 2. Change something 3. Go elsewhere 4. Go to notifications (Switch had reverted) 5. reload page (Switch was changed)