Jump to content

Steve Giller

Hornbill Staff
  • Posts

    6,498
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    268

Everything posted by Steve Giller

  1. You can do this with a Dynamic Checkbox group (see above) however this will not link multiple sites to a Request, that is a 1:1 relationship. You will need to store the results of the checkbox group in a Custom Field.
  2. @lokentSpecifically h_custom_21 - h_custom_25 h_custom_26 and higher are not Date/Time fields.
  3. "Questions" are specifically the ones asked (and answered) in the Intelligent Capture. If you are hoping to populate the "Questions" section by extracting data from the email I'm afraid that's not going to happen.
  4. Unfortunately this is not possible. There could be any number of assets linked to a Request, so it is not practical to have this as a column. Additionally, only columns from the Request table are available in the Request List View, and relationships between Requests and Assets are stored in a separate table. Currently the only way that I'm aware of to achieve this would be to manually populate a Custom Field with the Asset ID and have that column in a Custom View.
  5. @QEHNick%m is Month, you need %i for minutes.
  6. I can confirm I've tested this and it is working on Build 2690, so this is possibly a caching issue. Can you perform an Empty cache and hard refresh (Open the developer tools in your browser and right-click the refresh icon) and try again, please?
  7. What do you see in the email when you use those values? I also notice that you appear to have multiple Cloud Automations with the same Result Reference - this means that only the last one exists, the previous results having been overwritten. The Result Reference should be different for each node to ensure output variables are unique. Just as a posting tip, you can paste images directly into a forum post - images in a Word Document can be a real pain to use!
  8. I think that's outside of the scope of the API scheduler (although you could fork the GitHub and develop it down that route if required) and it might be worth investigating if ITOM would be the tool to use.
  9. There is an Assets form in the Intelligent Capture, this can have various filters applied in the parameters, Customer's Assets being one of them.
  10. @Geoff Soper Are you in the Service Manager Application section? I believe that will affect the Tables available for use in Reports.
  11. @Geoff Soper Are you selecting the correct Application - for example Service Manager - before going to the Reports section?
  12. With an Update Request -> Custom Fields node. I appreciate the next question will be "How do we get the information out of the Email?" and that's the hard part - you need a perfectly consistent, well formed, preferably unformatted email, and a good grasp of regular expressions.
  13. No - but you can map them in the Business Process.
  14. No. You could, but I think that would be overkill in this case - just copy the process from the list, and give it a suitable name: Once you've done that you can either make the minor adjustment to the the new Process then assign it to the active Service/CI, or if it's more convenient, make the minor adjustment to the existing Process and republish it, using the copy as the development draft.
  15. Yes, and use a Date/Time field (h_custom_21 - h_custom_25)
  16. @Adam Toms That's a good option, we will be able to add this in. It's too late for the next Service Manager release which is already in the testing phase, but will be in the one after that.
  17. Reports are something that you can write yourself, and you can copy and adapt the Service Request reports to apply to Problems as well/instead. The best starting point for this would be the wiki page and its related pages.
  18. If you change the CRON expression to run at 2am you are never affected by Daylight Saving changes. I'm not an expert on CRON (or even a novice, for that matter) but the wikipedia entry may help here.
  19. Glad that's working again, and that you spotted the reason. Could I just ask the logic behind routinely signing in with the System Administrator account? This is not something we would recommend.
  20. @SmurfyNo, but you can make the "Standard" Custom View and share it to as many people as you like.
  21. That's a simple one - unfortunately not. There are no plans that I'm aware of to change the External Authorisation node - it is designed to deliver a very clean, simple option for Authorisations that are emailed to Users without requiring a Collaboration License.
  22. It's not clear what you're talking about here - you mention Changes, which are a request type, but the screenshot appears to be an Authorisation node, which could be External or Full. Can you clarify what you're asking, possibly with a screenshot encapsulating more of the config so we know what we're looking at, please?
×
×
  • Create New...