AlexTumber

@Ann without looking at the request it's difficult to see. Perhaps something our support team can help with. I'll ask them to respond. Alex

@Paul Alexander yes this feature is designed to remove all cancelled projects and their associated relationships. Alex

@Paul Alexander I believe there is an issue around cancelling a system task that you don't personally own but I will feed this back to the team as it should be cancelling the lot. Alex

@Will J Douglas thanks for confirming. Yes the tooltip behaviour is a frustration and hopefully something we will be able to change soon. Alex

@Will J Douglas thanks for your post. Just to confirm; you have multiple milestones within a single project that have the same due date? When the gantt chart is rendered, a list of all milestones is gathered, ordered by due date. They are then added to the chart starting with the earliest date all the way through to the latest date. What I would expect to see if you have multiple milestones of the same date is that they are all rendered on top of each other (giving the appearance that there is just one - the last one). I will pass this onto our development and product teams as we'll need to work out how to display the information if there are multiple milestones with the same date. Alex

@Martyn Houghton I'm afraid not, no. Alex

@Tom Gilbert thanks for your post. Yes this is something that is planned in coming updates. Hopefully we will see it added to the application soon. Alex

@Ann thanks for the information. Email is something we have been planning to add to Project Manager projects for a long time now. I can see this working particularly well when that's available. I've fed everything back to our product team for consideration. As always, thanks for your feedback and suggestions. It's much appreciated. Alex

@Tom Gilbert thanks for your post. I've fed this back to our product team for review. Alex

@Frank Reay yes this is currently work in progress. I appreciate the pain it's causing by not being able to duplicate. Hopefully the functionality will be fixed soon. Alex

@Adrian Simpkins thanks for your post. I would be most interested to see the specific examples so that we can work through and fix the issue(s). Alex

@Frank Reay thanks for your post. I will ask our development team to investigate the custom field issue and will forward the pins idea to our product team. It should be fairly simple to add. Alex

@Ann thanks for your post. This feature is still work in progress and I can't give any accurate timescale predictions - at least until the next Project Manager update goes live. What I can say though is that the next update will include the ability to create and modify project tasks without any form of assignee, which will allow you to better plan your projects. Alex

@Ann thanks for your post. Do you mean like in service manager where you can effectively place a request on hold pending a response from a supplier? Alex

@Ann thanks for your post. Is time recording enabled against the service that the request has been raised against? Alex

@Martyn Houghton thanks for your post. I will ask our development team to investigate. Alex

@Martyn Houghton thanks for your post. I'll ask our development team to investigate. Alex

@Martyn Houghtonnot yet I'm afraid. I will post back here when the functionality is available. Alex

@Frank Reay our development team have added the supplier name to the contract page. This will be available in the next update: Alex

@Ann @Frank Reay thanks for your posts. We are still working on adding this functionality. As soon as I have an update I will post back here. Alex

@Frank Reay thanks for your post. This sounds like a defect to me. I will ask our development team to investigate. I believe the search box should be looking for contracts based on name and the unique id but I will see what our team come back with. Alex

@Frank Reay thanks for your post. This functionality has already been approved by our product team and is on our list to add. Hopefully it will be added soon. Alex

@Frank Reay thanks for your post. This functionality has already been approved by our product team and is on our list to add. Hopefully it will be added to Supplier Manager soon. Alex

@Frank Reay thanks for your post and apologies for the delayed response. Regarding your points: 1. Yes - I will ask our development team to add this so that the supplier name is also presented, as well as their logo. 2. This has been identified as a defect and our development team are currently working to fix this. An asset should not be able to be removed from a supplier if there are existing contracts that use it. 3. Thanks for these enhancement suggestions. I will pass them onto our development and product teams. 4. I will check with our core development team as this sounds like a potential defect. Alex

@Frank Reay thanks for your post and apologies for the delayed response. Yes we are planning on adding auto tasks to Supplier Manager but we are currently waiting for updated auto task functionality to become available for use by our development team. I don't have any timescales unfortunately but I will post back here when there is some news regarding auto tasks for Supplier Manager. Alex