ArmandoDM
-
Posts
532 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
10
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Enhancement Requests
Posts posted by ArmandoDM
-
-
Good evening @Gareth Cantrell
thank you for reporting this issue.
We were able to replicate it.
This has been fixed now and the fix will be availble in the next build.Regards
Armando
- 1
-
Good afternoon @JanS2000
we identified the issu reported above and we're working on a fix.
Kind regards
Armando
- 1
-
Hi @CraigP
can I please have more details about where in the process the duplicate is created ? A screenshot of the relevant nodes or a simplified process that we can use as an example might help us replicating the issue.
From what I can see, the nodes that link an asset to a request are 'Requests->Assets->Create ... Asset' (in which case the system create a new asset and link to the requests) and 'Requests->Assets->Add ... Asset', but none of these operations should create duplicates, and we cannot replicate the issue you mention.
RegardsArmando
-
we found a small issue in the last build which has now been fixed.
May I ask you to try again please and confirm if the issue is fixed?
Regards
Armando -
-
the option to edit the questions is only available for single-line and multi-line text fields. More info about the Questions on the page below.
https://wiki.hornbill.com/index.php?title=Mapping_Fields_from_Customised_Forms
Hope it helps
Regards
Armando
- 1
-
Hi @Jeremy
that variable needs to be the ID of the customer rather than the username. Can you double check that what you pass is the ID ?
Regards
Armando
-
the search terms are always put in OR condition and there is not a way of using AND .
Nonetheless the search results are ordered by number of matches, so for example the results where the match has been found 2 times will be displayed above the ones where the match has been found 1 time.
RegardsArmando
-
unfortunately at the moment there is no app setting to switch 'include closed and cancelled requests' to ON.
-
ideally we need a use case to replicate the issue.
I will try a few case to see if I can replicateArmando
-
yes I was talking of the build 2674.
May I ask you to unlink/link again the asset please? If this doesn't work, then we need to look at your instance as we cannot replicate the issue.
Thank you
Armando
-
-
Hi @samwoo
yes this could actually be the case. If the app setting is ON then yes, the request will be assigned to the same owner and the owner is notified as expected.
According to our tests, if you set the app setting to OFF then the original owner should not receive the email anymore.
Of course you can also verify if the Business Process reassign the request and removes the owner, which would explain the behaviour reported in the original post.
If you do these checks and can let me know if the issue is solved, please do let me know.I also forgot to mention about this : If I use the Copy Request functionality against a ticket that I am the "Owner" of, then I don't receive a notification email. If you perform an action involving yourself, then you will not be notified about it. So, because its you triggering the assignment to yourself, you won't receive any notification telling 'Request XXX has been assigned to Samwoo". I hope this makes sense ?
Thank youArmando
- 1
-
Good afternoon @samwoo
we are unable to replicate the issue.
In our test, the app setting 'app.request.copy.owner' is set to FALSE so the copy is assigned to the team but not the owner.
Nonetheless, the original owner receives a notification, but that's because 'guest.app.requests.notification.notificationType.assignmentTeam' is enabled, so its a team assignment notification.
If I understand well, are you saying that the original owner is notified that the request has been assigned to himself rather than his team ?If this is the case, can you please tell the values of these app-settings and check the email template defined into 'guest.app.requests.notification.emailTemplate.groupAssignment' is the correct one please? Ideally we can be able to replicate the issue.
guest.app.requests.notification.allowUserDefinedNotificationType
app.request.copy.owner
guest.app.requests.notification.notificationType.assignment
guest.app.requests.notification.notificationType.assignmentTeam
Thank youArmando
-
Thank you @Paul Alexander,
yes please, let me know if the issue is fixed or it still persists
Armando
-
the link should work both ways, yes, and we're unable to replicate the issue.
I think this has been fixed already and the fix should be in the next build.
May I ask to try again after the next build ? It should be available tomorrow.
If the problem still persists then we need to investigate on your instance.Regards
Armando
-
we are unable to replicate this issue. It could be a caching issue.
Have you tried refreshing the asset page ?
Regards
Armando
-
Apologies for the inconvenience.
We're working to find the issue and fix it.
Regards
Armando
-
Hello @Caroline
we run a few tests in this area and we are unable to replicate the issue.
Are the Organization and the filter just been created ? Does the issue occurs after updating the filter ? Any change in the external customers belonging to the Org or in the Org name ?
If you could give any information to help replicating the issue, it would be appreciated.
Regards
Armando
-
Thank you for confirming @Frank Reay
I'll mention the problem with the button for fix.
Regards
Armando
-
Hi @HGrigsby @Frank Reay @nasimg
a fix to this issue has been applied to your instances.
If you could confirm that the functionality is working as expected now, we would appreciate.
Regards
Armando
-
Hello @sprasad
we were able to replicate the issue #2 and we're working on a fix. I will keep you updated as we progress.
As far the issue #1, as confirmed in the messages, this has been fixed already.
Thank you
Armando
-
-
Hi @sprasad
yes please.
If you can send to me in a private message the passcode and details on where to look for the issue, I'll pass it to one of my colleagues for investigation.
Thank youArmando
Issue with display of feedback setup in Service Portfolio
in System Administration
Posted
Good morning @Adrian Simpkins
to my understanding you have 2 questions, one with 2 answers (Yes/No) and the other one with 6 answers (Bad/Ok/Good/Great/...)
The images 2 and 4 are corrects, as the user only sees the relevant answers for that question.
In the image 1 you should only see Yes/No, and the in the image 3 you should only see Bad/Ok/.... instead of all anwers for all questions.
This issue has been fixed and it will be available in the next build.
Regards
Armando