Jump to content

Lyonel

Hornbill Users
  • Posts

    683
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25

Posts posted by Lyonel

  1. Hi,

    Is it possible to extend the list of fields available when retrieving the request details in a BPM?

    What I am trying to achieve is detecting if the customer has closed the request him/herself via the self service portal. The idea is to send the customer an email to tell him that:

    • she / he did not respond in the last 3 working days
    • so we closed the call on his / her behalf
    • she / he has 20 days left to provide some feedback.

    The ultimate goal is to get people to log onto the service portal a lot more often.

    One of the method to do it is like so:

    image.thumb.png.65c09d00d866a6a037a3da440a359a91.png

    image.png.608ed17d97ba3208e6f153be02c78290.png

    I would like to compare Flowcodes -> Customer to Flowcodes -> Closed By? 

    Is that something you can help me with? I am happy with another new field too! Whatever is the easiest solution really :)

     

  2. Hi,

    I am using the "post to public workspace" automated task in most of our BPMs with the below config:

    image.png.0c1e29492117b803bba5fe78830a1259.png

     

    As you can see, it is a pretty straight forward setup.

    I noticed recently that not all P1 calls make their way to the workspace... Looking deeper into the details, I also noticed that only calls raised by users get published. Now this is a problem if a basic user (e.g. customer) log a request via the self service portal! 

    Is this a limitation of the method? Or a bug? (I really hope for the latter, otherwise I am screwed)

    Thanks!

  3. Hi,

    One of the many great features of Hornbill is the ability to resolve a request using an existing FAQ.

    However, if the FAQ contains formatted text or images / videos, it becomes a bit useless :( Indeed, the rich text will not display properly in the resolution box. Same issue with the email that can be sent (via BPM).

    I already mentioned that to some of the Devs and product specialists. This needs to be fixed to make full use of the feature.

    I would like to extend this topic to other customers and get your feedback too:

    When using a FAQ to resolve a request, could we possibly include the URL to the FAQ too? The idea would be to make it obvious to the customer that the answer was readily available from the beginning? It could something as simple as : [Source: https://service.hornbill.com/XXX/servicemanager/service/99/faqs/]

    What do you think?

  4. Hi,

    I just wanted to take 30s to say a big thank you to Hornbill's team for making such a "small" change that makes my colleagues' life 100% easier :)

    Keep these changes coming guys :)

    Thanks again for your efforts. It is good to see a number of "old" changes / improvements getting delivered in recent weeks.

    Have a nice X-Mas!

    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...