-
Posts
469 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
20
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Enhancement Requests
Posts posted by Darren Rose
-
-
-
1 hour ago, Victor said:
@Darren Rose it would be a report based on this type of query:
SELECT h_itsm_requests.h_pk_reference, TIMEDIFF(h_itsm_requests.h_datelogged, h_msg_messages.h_msg_date_received) as time_difference, h_itsm_requests.h_datelogged, h_msg_messages.h_msg_date_received FROM h_itsm_requests JOIN h_msg_messages ON h_msg_messages.h_msg_id = h_itsm_requests.h_source_id WHERE h_itsm_requests.h_source_type = 'Email'
Obviously, the fields ins this SELECT example are just that, examples, apart from calculated "time_difference" which is actually the time difference you are looking for... What I mean is that you don't have to return h_pk_reference, h_datelogged or h_msg_date_received ... you can remove them or not, add other fields, etc. As per your needs.
Works a treat, thanks Victor
-
Hello
Is there a method for reporting on the time to respond to email? I am interested in finding out the date difference between the time an email was recieved and when it is raised as a ticket.
thanks
-
Hi
We've been doing a lot of test projects, and I'd like to clear them out from the DB, so that I can start with a clean slate. Is there a process in place for being able to do this?
Thanks
Darren
-
Thanks @James Ainsworth
-
15 hours ago, James Ainsworth said:
Hi @Darren Rose
Looking at your first screen shot I'm going to assume that the CH is not searching on the Request ID as there is a SR record displayed in your results. SR00000070. It looks like the requests being returned are from the summary where you have "Project Change Request''.
I will need to see if the search include the request ID. It might also be that the ID requires a complete ID and not a partial ID. If the ID is not included in the search, we can look to have this added.
Regards,
James
James,
Doesn't seem to be picking up Change Requests Properly. If I type in the full number, I don't get any results
-
Hi,
I've noticed an odd behavior when searching for Change Requests to add as a relationship. When I type CH the list starts to show changes.
However, when I then start to add '0's it doesn't work e.g CH00
Thanks
Darren
-
On 10/16/2017 at 1:35 PM, Ehsan said:
Hi @Muneer,
This behaviour is controlled via an Application Setting. You can enable visibility of Change Requests in the Portal through the Admin Tool (https://admin.hornbill.com/charnwoodbc/settings/application/com.hornbill.servicemanager/).
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Ehsan
I was struggling to get changes to appear, and the forum comes to the rescue. again.
Thanks
-
@Gerry we create Apps, and manage them how we always do - excel spreadsheets and MS project...
even if we haven't created the App in house, managing the lifecycle and feature requests through a product app rather than relying on Subject Matter Expert knowledge, would bring a level of governance that we currently lack
- 1
-
@Gerry a product manager app is definitely something that VINCI is interested in
-
+ 1 for this functionality too.
Being able to use Skype for business to search a users ticket history, as well as allow the option to raise a new from their record would be extremely useful and improve the overall experience for End User and Service desk Staff alike
-
Do we know what the problem was @TrevorKillick? We seem to have run into a few issues with reports over the last couple of weeks...
-
+1 from me too
-
Yep, we've raised this request before for Tasks to be able to take into account working calendar, so I will add my +1 to this post as well
-
The h_itsm_services table has 2 columns which we would find very useful to use - Business Owner and Technical Owner
However, these do not appear to be used and I am unable to populate them via the Services in Service Manager. Am I missing something?
thanks
Darren
-
Hi
It would be really useful to associate a project with some Organisational Data. This could be as a relationship maybe?
We currently report on projects by the Operating Divisions of the company, so being able to include this information would be very useful.
Also, projects may also have a sponsor from the business who is not a Service Manager User. At the moment, I cannot add them to the project in anyway because they are a basic user, but it would be useful to be able to add them to the project, even if only to able to use it at a reporting level
thanks
Darren
-
-
-
Thanks for the reply @Steven Boardman and I thought you might say about Customer Manager
I'll use the Custom Button Workaround option, which I had already done to take me to the doc library, but see if I can improve it with the tips you've provided.
thanks
Darren
-
Hello
We're currently using Organisations in Service Manager to keeping our Service Partners information - key contacts, support email addresses etc... It would be really useful to be able to add attachments against an Organisation so that I could attach the Service Agreement, or other such documents to the Organisation.
Is this function something that could be added?
Thanks
Darren
-
Thanks @Steven Boardman that looks very promising indeed.
As soon as it's ready, we've some excellent scenarios where it will definitely win us some points with the business. We've got the buy in from another team to start using Service Manager to manage their own service, and FAQ's and End User knowledge at point of logging a call are going to big factor in how successful it is.
Thanks
Darren
- 1
-
You beat me to it, @Keith Our existing project portfolio is very similar and there is a requirement for some additional fields to be added to the project, and some custom fields would be ideal
Thanks
Darren
-
On 9/25/2017 at 9:20 AM, Steven Boardman said:
Just a quick update on this, we are currently working on a knowledge story to introduce dynamic knowledge in progressive capture - so basically as your analysts and customers are filling int their progressive capture forms, they will (non intrusively) be presented with relevant knowledge (in the form of FAQ's, requests, known issues etc). As part of this story we have improved the search query, and also applied this to the general search query used in the portals.
So once the knowledge story is released, your users will get two things:
1. Dynamic knowledge during the progressive capture logging process (hopefully cutting down further on the amount of tickets which need to be raised)
2. Multi word search matching, irrespective of order or position in documents, so using the original example a search for Holiday Approval would look for matches on Holiday Approval, Holiday or Approval and return matches against all of these.
Sneak preview of the NEW progressive capture search below, obviously the look and feel is subject to change before release:
This work is currently ongoing but watch out for the release notes in the Service Manager updates in the coming weeks
Steve
Are there any updates on the development of Dynamic knowledge?
Thanks
Darren
-
8 minutes ago, alextumber said:
Thanks for your post @Darren Rose.
I can see the value of what you are saying here and will feed this back to our product team.
Alex
Thanks again
Self Service Reporting
in Service Manager
Posted
Hi
I wondered if there were any updates on when Self Service reporting will be available in Service manager, including the ability to schedule reports?
Thanks
Darren