Jump to content

Darren Rose

Hornbill Users
  • Posts

    469
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    20

Posts posted by Darren Rose

  1. Hi

    On the contracts view, would it be possible to have additional filters, ideally the expiry with 30 days, 60 days, 90 days as a starter. At the moment, there's no quick way quick way to review contracts due in 90 days like there is in customer manager. 

    Status would also be the other main filter we would use

    Thanks 

    image.thumb.png.2f69fe82f5399bc4c31f79d2b6868110.png

     

     

     

  2. Hi

    would it be possible to NOT have to define the start and end date of the tasks in the project template, or when adding a task to a project? 

    We like to work on the principle of backlog, and then only schedule the task when we move it out of backlog. We cannot work this way at the moment, due to the waterfall approach to tasks. 

    Could this be looked at as an option? 

    thanks 

    Darren

  3. Hi

    When using the search widget, and filtering by domain, the results for All do no work

    I have set this search to filter by the HR domain only. If I type in Payslip and leave it on All I don't get any results. 

    image.png.091b68875528c5599769b0bf0373686c.png

    If I switch it to FAQ, I get the result I was expecting

    image.png.4bb558e66171816942a17b45adeb15b7.png

    I would have expected the result to still come up in All even though I'm filtering on domain

    Thanks

    Darren

  4. 3 hours ago, AlexTumber said:

    Hi @Katie thanks for your post.
     

    I will pass this onto our development and product teams.

    Alex

    Thanks, Alex. A team outside of IT are looking to use timesheet manager, so fixing this issue around the displayed values not relating to a working day would be a big help in them adopting it

    Darren 

  5. On 12/4/2019 at 4:20 PM, Gerry said:

    @Stephen.whittle

    Thanks for the question, its a good one!  You are right, having looked at all of the other enterprise type ITOM solutions they are generally based on per-asset pricing, that seems to be the way it works.  So, setting aside our existing customers for one second, one of the biggest challenges with pricing is how we enable people who wish to select a product to buy, to compere apples with apples - hence the per-asset pricing.  However, we also recognise that some people will just want to manage things like AD accounts, so arguably would only need to "manage" a couple of computers (their AD servers), and in this case we could not justify the on going development of such an initiative for our customers if we could only monazite £2/month. Clearly therefore we have a pricing conundrum and it is something we are researching now, but in recognition of this and in the spirit of moving things forwards for our existing customers, I went with the sample per computer/month model, but set a minimum level of 1000 assets,  that was a back-stop position rather than the final pricing strategy.  

    So I am not entirely sure I have a good answer at this point, but I am interested in any thoughts. 

    Gerry

     

    Hi Gerry

    Our situation is similar to @Stephen.whittle We manage assets through SCCM and Intune, but would be using ITOM for User and Group management so the pricing model would not necessarily apply. However, if there was a set cost similar to the iBridge model, then that would work for us. Interesting to see where you head with this because it's part of our planning and considerations

    Thanks

    Darren 

  6. Hi

    we've imported a list of Supplier using the template, which all worked great, but on the list of the Suppliers in the Supplier Catalog, its displaying the custom 1 and custom 9 fields. It's not displaying the name of the fields to what we've set them in the form either. Not sure what to do to make it display something more useful / accurate

     

    image.png.79c7951942c96718fc98cda9843eda24.png

×
×
  • Create New...