Jump to content

Jim

Hornbill Users
  • Posts

    395
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by Jim

  1. I have had this same problem just for anyone else searching I found using a percentage opposed to px sizing works better
  2. Can I have any advice on this please, the summary and description are still holding the original request information and not writing the new values
  3. Brilliant Thank you very much
  4. Hi, I have an issue with our Service level agreements and the timers not setting accurately, when using 'days' in the service level it seems to be using a count of 24 hours to be one day based on the work time calendar opposed to calendar days, for example a SLA of 2 days response and 4 days resolution Logged on the 07/03/23 09:55 are being set to Resolution of 14/03/23 15:55 and Resolve of 22/03/23 13:25 Our calendar operates 8.5 hour days Monday to Thursday and 8 hour days on a Friday, when calculating the dates it is using 24 working hours as 1 day
  5. Any chance of an update please?
  6. Hi Steve, Thank you for the response, In my scenario If I send an email in the 'To' section to 5 different people and then 'cc' in another 2 people it will only show the 2 that were cc'd in, So when we send emails to a user and there manager you can't see this in the updates that the manager was included in the Timeline updates
  7. Any chance of a response on this please?
  8. I agree this would be quite useful, similar to the email templates 'find in process' function
  9. Hi, When an email is added to a request due the routing rules, it only shows the 'cc' information and does not display who that email was actually sent to. Is this something I need to configure and if so, how?
  10. I also have remove completely set to true on mine
  11. @lee mcdermott what's the error you get? the only thing I can think is if it's not getting the card ID in the same stage it will fail
  12. @lee mcdermott you first need to get the card ID using the following settings below and then set that as the 'card ID' opposed to auto
  13. @lee mcdermottit may be one of your escalation events in the service level timers, not sure about the error itself but the escalation events may be a good place to start
  14. At the moment when suspending and waiting I have to choose a specific action to watch, in my scenario I am waiting for an update and if it meets certain criteria it will go into a Major incident process, If a request is resolved it will still sit waiting for the update, I have set an expiry time to handle this however it is not the est solution as a resolution notification won't be triggered until the time expires.
  15. Hi @Berto2002 I personally would recommend using an escalation event within the high priority service levels and making sure either some or all users have the 'Advanced Request Task Completer' service desk right as below I can send a notification to the owners manger and set a time it will trigger this so if there is 1 hour left to meet the resolution target time or resolution etc In terms of a report maybe you could filter based on priority and is not resolved and then check the timestamp of the last update by joining the requests table to the h_buz_activities table to get a time stamp and then set a time range of what is considered an inactive request?
  16. I have since turned this off which allowed custom fields to right the new value however the summary and description remain the existing data from the initial request
  17. Hi Steve, This setting is already turned on currently
  18. Hi, I am having an issue where raising a new linked request is copying the custom fields from the initial request and ignoring all of the new information filled in through the intelligent captures You can see in the questions section I entered different information on this request but the custom fields in the details section show the information provided in the initial request
×
×
  • Create New...