Jump to content

Ann-MarieHolloway

Hornbill Users
  • Posts

    303
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Ann-MarieHolloway

  1. On 7/22/2020 at 11:15 PM, James Ainsworth said:

    Hi @Ann-MarieHolloway

    You may notice that on the template these two lines are highlighted with a grey background.  These are actually for the different types of customers - user and contact.  User being an internal user and a contact being someone external to your company.

    image.png

    This highlighted text is because they have conditions set against them. You don't actually need to remove either one of these.  The line will only show if the selected condition is met.  In this case the customer type 0 refers to an internal user who would access the request through the Employee Portal and the customer type 1 refers to a contact who would access the Customer Portal.  These ESP Conditions can be extremely useful as you can add a lot more conditional information to an email, depending on who the recipient is.  You can view the existing condition by clicking anywhere within the highlighted area and then click on the ESP Condition Properties button

    image.png

    I hope that helps,

    Regards,

    James

    Just another quick query, is this notification also made available to Connections?

  2. Hi Hornbill folks,

    We are about to enable the  CustomerTimelineUpdateNotification and make it available on our Services.  I have noticed there are 2 hyperlinks in the email notification 

     

    https://live.hornbill.com/<instance>/servicemanager/selfservice2/request/{{.H_pk_reference}}/

    https://service.hornbill.com/<instance>/servicemanager/request/view/{{.H_pk_reference}}/

    Which I'm assuming are 1 for analysts and 1 for basic users and this is how it was sent, before I added our instance to the hyperlink.  Now each user gets both hyperlinks and I'm wondering if that is correct?

    Also, if a Connection is added to the ticket, do they also receive the notification email to say the ticket has been updated?

    Many Thanks

  3. On 6/22/2020 at 9:31 AM, AndyGilly said:

    can I please propose a enhancement to the connections functionality

    through a allocated role could a self-service user add their own connections to a ticket using the my requests widget??

    this would stop the need for a phone call to the service desk

    +1 from me too

    • Thanks 1
  4. 20 minutes ago, David Hall said:

    @Ann-MarieHolloway The fix for the specific error mentioned by Daniel in the post is for those who have already just updated to the latest update of Service Manager and have not performed an application reload manually, the subscription issue is an entirely separate issue that is being investigated right now.

    Kind Regards,

    Dave

    Thank you @David Hall I'll leave you guys investigate and keep refreshing the page for updates.

    • Like 2
  5. Hi @ArmandoDM thanks for your response.  We have this setup already, but we have a..........................................................eager Problem Manager who likes to know everything as it happens, so I was wondering if we could enable a notification for impacted or unavailable Services.

  6. Hi all, Happy Friday.

    Is there a way to export the list of organisation types/groups from Service Manager to say a .csv or .xls file?

    A user has asked for access to a number of teams, but doesn't know what they want access to and I'm trying to demonstrate all possibilities.  There is a post here 

    that seems similar, but doesn't really answer my question.

    Many Thanks 

  7. Good Afternoon,

     

    Hope everyone is well and keeping safe.

    I have had a quick look through the various queries involving Service Manager and Google Chrome but can't find anything similar.  A member of staff has attempted to update his call via the self service portal by adding an attachment (not a large file) via Chrome and received the error image.png.c9eccfaa0e609777d0c463f2ca9c0da4.pnghowever, it worked perfectly find in IE.

    I tried the same thing on my machine and it worked, so not a major issue but wondered if there are discrepancies with versions of Chrome v Hornbill or if this is simply a cache issue.

    I am using image.png.0b92674a7b7738e2fa84a9fd97dcb39d.png and everything works well.  Just asking the user to check their version.

     

    Many Thanks

×
×
  • Create New...