Jump to content

davidrb84

Hornbill Users
  • Posts

    254
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by davidrb84

  1. thanks @James Ainsworth this is useful, but there are a couple of elements that would be useful if changed.

    1) Applying view type filters to the report seems to apply to the problems, rather than the incidents. So for example creating a view to only show "this week" won't show anything as the problems were from weeks ago, even though the incidents were from this week

    2) In this case I'm trying to show those incidents that don't have a problem associated, which is why showing it as a field in a view would allow sorting/filtering.

  2. Having undertaken a review of our Service Catalogue we have a need to create/retire and rename dozens of services.

    I suspect retiring and renaming makes most sense to do manually.

    But, is there a mechanism by which new services can be created in bulk?

  3. Hi

    I wonder if anyone else would find it useful to be able to have a clickable link in the request view of FAQs to jump straight to an edit screen for that FAQ.

    Use case would be, I'm about to use this FAQ but notice it's incorrect/typo/incomplete and want to quickly go and correct it.

    *Wonder over the epic mockup I've produced*

    image.png.b2dd34e46ab6a2ff6e16b4f316b5d6f1.png

     

  4. Good morning,

    I appreciate the new Portal is pending, and I'm glad to hear the obvious effort into making it robust.

    However, I have a question about Service Domains and Service Categories and their relationships to Services in the new release.

    We're redesigning our service catalogue (I mean the actual catalogue, not it's presentation in SM) but would like to mary this to the structure in SM.

    From what I've seen there are a few possible options, is anyone able to shed any light?

     

    1) Service Domains top of the tree, categories are associated to 1 domain, services to 1 of those categories. (Or domains and categories reversed)

    2) Service Domains and Service Categories are peers, with services associated to both 1 category and 1 domain

    3) Something else.

  5. While we're in wishlist land, a tab or box on the right perhaps showing some real time Service specific stats  e.g.

     

    • Time since last Critical Incident
    • List last 5 Critical Incidents
    • Incidents raised in last 7/30/90 days (or similar)
    • Requests older than 30/90 days
  6. Hi @James Ainsworth that's exactly where we were thinking.

    And yes adding built-in fields would be nice.

    Any or all of the below would be amazing, I've included an idea of the format.

    • Business Owner (single account picker (like owner is at the moment))
    • Service Manager (single account picker (like owner is at the moment))
    • Technical Contact (could be single account picker (like owner is at the moment) better would be multiple account picker. Pretty good would be multi line text)
    • Detailed technical description of service (i.e. not something customer facing like the main description)
    • Tier (e.g. 1/2/3) (Drop down based on simple list?)
    • Last Service Review (date)
    • Third-Party contact details(Multi line text)
    • Change Management details (Service specific details e.g. routine maintenance windows, at-risk periods, critical times, etc)(Multi line text)
    • Agreed Escalation paths (e.g. Service Desk -> Business technical team -> supplier or Service Desk --> 3rd Party support)(Multi line text)
    • Related Services (links to other services, or a multi line text to describe those relationships)
    • A diary function would be great showing changes over time, like you get for requests. (e.g. UserName changed Service title from "Test" to "Test 23")

     

     

  7. As an organisation we're having a go at using Service Manager as a Service Portfolio tool.

    We plan to store the data as attributes of the service rather than in an old-school document (all previous attempts have done that).

    I'm finding I need more fields than the 6 or so I'm able to add.

    Is there any chance of adding more?

     

    Also: It's nice having an 'owner' and that's presented when adding authorisers to an associated change request. But having an identified technical contact, service manager, business owner, would be really helpful as well (although possibly harder) having all these presented in the suggested authorisers bit of the add authorisers dialog would be great.

×
×
  • Create New...