Jump to content

davidrb84

Hornbill Users
  • Posts

    254
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by davidrb84

  1. Good afternoon all,

    As a rule we do not assign requests/incidents to individuals in our system. However, we have a small team of account managers who work independently of each other (different parts of the building).

    For these managers we assign requests/incidents to them directly.

    For anyone else who does something similar in Service Manager how do you deal with leave/absence for these people?

    We had an issue where a job was assigned of a time sensitive nature, but the manager in question was on leave for a week.

    The Desk didn't get an ooh email as the servicedesk account had already been sent one on another matter (and google only sends 1 notification).

    We're going to maintain an in/out whiteboard for them, but seems a bit old-school.

  2. Us too, particularly as we have to subscribe almost all of our services to every user, in order that they can view their 'tickets' in the service portal. This includes most where they will not have the right to raise a 'ticket' vi the service portal.

    Currently we're prefixing those we need to be first with a · but this does mean it orders these services in the user app as well, which is annoying.

  3. Good afternoon,

    We are currently in the process of building up our Service Manager instance and have got as far as populating our wider user base, including their email addresses.

    We want to have email services enabled to test the various email notifications and functionality, but I am concerned about mistakes causing emails to go out to real users (those not in the project team)

    Is there any way to limit outbound emails to a smallish range of addresses?

  4. This was raised in a different thread but I've duplicated the request here for visibility, as this looks like an enhancement request rather than a bug.

    On the Service Portal the Customers only see requests against services that are set to visible on the portal, not ALL their requests.

    Making all Services visible on the portal will result in a large number of services being shown that have no actionable Catalogue Items. This masks the relatively few that have customer facing PCFs behind them.

  5. Thanks again @Lyonel  your comment made me try something else that rings a bell from a long while ago. It only shoes Requests/Incidents against services that are visible on the portal. This doesn't seem quite right, is this normal?

    Essentially we have a 6-8 services with Catalogue items for customer self service, but a larger number that might be logged via the service desk agents.

    We would like the customers to be able to see updates, and update their incidents via the portal, even if they didn't log it there.

  6. We're part way through an implementation of Service Manager at the moment and are getting to grips with the Service Portal.

    We're coming from Supportworks and so heavily customised our self service portal, including inserting some javascript to overlay a Bomgar chat popup.

    I'm aware this is not possible at all at the moment, but was wondering if anyone else was using Bomgar for chat support and might like to jump on an enhancement request.

    We're going to be using a clickable link in a Progressive Capture as a stop gap, but would also be keen to hear people's ideas on better approaches to adding a link to the service portal. I should imagine there's all sorts of reasons people might need to link out to another site (corporate website or something maybe)

    Screen Shot 2018-05-11 at 08.56.46.png

  7. Looks like a cracking feature, basically exactly what I was looking for.

    Still getting my head around the divorced KE and PB classes, but on that subject I'm wondering why PBs aren't included in this feature.

    I appreciate a problem may not have a workaround, but knowing a problem exists may well prevent a whole load of wasted effort on the part of the desker getting this particular call.

  8. Afternoon All,

    Apologies firstly if this has been asked before, I search but found nothing relevant.

    I'm wondering what ways people have found of surfacing workarounds to Service Desk analysts when they're logging Incidents. In an ideal world the analyst would provide a service, and SM would present the analyst with open PB and KE records associated to it automatically.

    Is this something anyone has any experience of?

×
×
  • Create New...