Gemma Morrison
-
Posts
65 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Enhancement Requests
Posts posted by Gemma Morrison
-
-
@James Ainsworth Hi James, Hope you are well. Sorry to be a pain! I have got it working, yay! However within some of those stages we have skipped we have some authorisation tasks for the team to complete, is there a way of keeping these at all? or would I need to pop them into the 'in progress' stage?
-
@James Ainsworth Hi James, hope you are well. I have only just got round to looking into this setting! I have applied the setting and can't seem to figure out where to place the end node in order to skip certain checkpoint stages. In my picture screenshot above I am trying to skip 'amendment of supplier' for an example to then go straight to resolution and feedback... is this possible at all?
-
Thank you @James Ainsworth I will test this next week
@Alisha FYI!
-
-
Hi,
Within a BPM I know you can skip a checkpoint stage, however this would still appear in the heads up display, would there be a way of potentially hiding a stage you do not require for that p0articlaur request at all?
The screenshot below shows 2 different stages 'amendment of supplier' and 'new supplier' I was wondering if it would be possible to hide either of these depending on the request that has been logged via the request category..
-
1
-
-
+1 please! this would prevent sending emails to incorrect individuals and would benefit our team a lot!
-
-
Hello @James Ainsworth is there any update in regards to Alisha's idea at all please?
-
+1 Please!
-
This is really affecting our teams having to manually re-assign the requests!
Help! @Bob Dickinson Do you have any ideas?
-
-
1
-
-
@Victor Sorry to be a pain however I have just added in the brackets but it has brought back all records since our go live date?! :s am I getting it wrong?
-
@Victor Hi Victor, I know! trying to make the day go faster!
Thank you, that's really helpful! I did have to re-read it a few times to get my head around it but I will give it a go and let you know how I get on!
-
Hi Bob,
Yes I am sorry! The screenshot is below for you, however I have run and downloaded the report as I noticed that the preview can be incorrect sometimes as you have said! thanks for getting back to me so quickly!
-
@Victor Hi victor do you have any ideas on this one at all?
-
Hello,
I have tried to run a report on a date prompt range however, when the report has been completed after running it shows all records from that date range to present?
The only thing I can think of that is affecting the data would be because I have changed the category name, however I have included both within the filter.
Has anyone got any ideas on why this might be happening?
-
Hi Joyce, sorry for the long delay!
I have just had a look for you and this is the same for us, some have the time (in seconds) and some don't.
Hope this helps!
-
+1 for Alisha's idea please!!
-
-
Hello,
I have added an additional column into one of our reports to see the total onhold time, however I believe that the report shows the time in seconds
Would it be possible to have the report show this time in hours possibly please?
-
-
-
we are having the same issue here!
-
Hi,
I was wondering when the individual Service Domains are in Service Manager, will there be a certain location/place or folder as such, to track what changes have been made?
such as progressive captures? we would like a place to identify what we would currently have within that Service Domain. For an example, Facilities we would want to know, what reports we have, what boards we have, what changes we made to a certain progressive capture or business process?
It is just a way we could identify any changes in the system instead of keeping multiple spreadsheet outside Service Manager, we would prefer for it all to be together?
Is this something in the pipelines at all?
-
1
-
Progressive Capture following 'no match' but no changes made?
in Service Manager
Posted
Hello,
We are experiencing our service requests and incidents progressive captures following our 'no match' option via the selection progressive cap which use 'switch capture' nodes...we have made no changes and cannot find what the issue is to fix it.
The BPM's seem to be in working order.
Any ideas @Bob Dickinson @Victor - This has been raised via the support process via Paul Wilcock but we really need an answer/help please