AndyGilly Posted October 15, 2019 Share Posted October 15, 2019 to make life easier for agents, it would be great to be able to only allow visibility of priorities which relate to the type of request (incident, request, change, problem) that has been created. Is this something anyone else has requested or something that would be considered for future development?? thanks Andy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martyn Houghton Posted October 15, 2019 Share Posted October 15, 2019 @AndyGilly This is something that has come up before. Our workaround is to use a custom form in the progressive capture to restrict the list of priorities available and then set the priority to the selected value in the BPM. However having the relationship of prioritises to services and request types would be a lot cleaner. Cheers Martyn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyGilly Posted October 15, 2019 Author Share Posted October 15, 2019 thank you @Martyn Houghton will have a read It was very much the agent interaction during the escalation function that I think would be where the value of the filtering would work. I wonder if the Hornbill team will revisit the request?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martyn Houghton Posted October 15, 2019 Share Posted October 15, 2019 @AndyGilly Yes we have that problem when using the escalate process, with a very long list of different priorities from a long list of different service level agreements. We have in essence disabled the 'Escalate' option and now only use the 'Priority' as the initial bases for the Service Level Agreement rules. Once the request is created we only adjust the Service Level, not the priority value. This way the analyst can only select the available 'Service Levels' linked to the Service. Cheers Martyn 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Boardman Posted October 15, 2019 Share Posted October 15, 2019 @AndyGilly thanks for the post. We do have a story for exactly this, i have added you as an interested connections ( @Martyn Houghton you are already connected). There is a fair amount of community interest for this, so as it gets (excuse the pun) priority, then we will post updates here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now