Dan Munns Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 Hi all, When I set attachments to 'Team' under visibility I have noticed that other users outside of the owning team can still see them. The user is in a supporting team for the request but surely shouldn't be able to see items set to team visibility when she is not a member of the owning team. Am I missing something somewhere? Also could we have the visibility option of 'Authoriser' added whereby they can only see the items if they are named in one of the authorisation nodes within the BPM for the request? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Munns Posted July 13, 2018 Author Share Posted July 13, 2018 @Victor any ideas? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victor Posted July 13, 2018 Share Posted July 13, 2018 @Dan Munns 2 hours ago, Dan Munns said: any ideas? er... yeah.. !?... er... wipe them out...? all of them...? or execute order 66? ... I suspect however that you are looking for a serious answer here... so 20 hours ago, Dan Munns said: When I set attachments to 'Team' under visibility I have noticed that other users outside of the owning team can still see them. As far as I am aware this is intended behavior and long as the other teams have the right to access the request. On the chance that I am wrong here @James Ainsworth and/or @Steven Boardman might be able to give us more details on how exactly is this intended to work and if we have a defect here or not... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Bridgens Posted July 13, 2018 Share Posted July 13, 2018 I always thought "Team" meant people with a SM license whereas customer is anybody. I may be wrong but its worked for me so far....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Munns Posted July 13, 2018 Author Share Posted July 13, 2018 @Victor @Josh Bridgens all I can find on the Wiki is from the 'Assign Action Item' page: This seems to indicate that team is the current team working on the request. Visibility Decide if the assign action post on the timeline of the request will be customer facing or private to the team working on the request. This seems to indicate that team is the current team working on the request, which was my understanding of it. I thought it was so that notes could be added on a request that may have a member from another team without fear of data leakage. As I said I can't seem to find a page on the wiki that states the exact usage of the visibilities (although that may well be my search-foo skills lacking today) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Ainsworth Posted July 13, 2018 Share Posted July 13, 2018 Hi @Dan Munns As suggested by Victor, the visibility of Team indicates anyone on a team that supports the service that the request is raised against. Regards, James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Munns Posted July 13, 2018 Author Share Posted July 13, 2018 @James Ainsworth thanks for the clarification. Am I right in thinking that owner is the request owner only and not the owning team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Ainsworth Posted July 16, 2018 Share Posted July 16, 2018 @Dan Munns When the request owner is referenced it is usually talking about the request owner only. Having the currently assigned team classed as the owning team is up for interpretation. The owner will need to be part of the assigned team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now