lomixture
-
Posts
262 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Enhancement Requests
Posts posted by lomixture
-
-
Hello all,
Back from 12 months of maternity leave, and wondering if there has been any movement on this?
We are going live with a new service soon, and have been asked the question of housing usable FAQs in the system again.
Thanks!
-
1
-
-
we've posted about this too!
-
1
-
-
Is there any suggestion of whether the ability to change the content of questions/summaries etc may be coming to the portals?
At the moment it's not a great issue for us, but with the potential for our HR service to come on board I can see a great number of instances whereby the customer includes some sensitive information in their request that shouldn't be there - at the moment I understand we have to come to Hornbill to have it removed by the development teams instead of managing ourselves.
That could be a lot of support calls!
-
I was wondering if there is a way of diminishing the list of assets based on key words in the question log?
We have a vast number of assets in our organisation ranging from computer hardware to estate management contracts, and the list is very large to search.
Is there a way of assigning key words to assets, so when those are mentioned in the question log only those with the key words are displayed? My thinking was: if the job was electrical, only the contractors we work with who are electrical specialist would appear, rather than 15,000 computers before we see the contractor?
It might be a bit too technical for the system, but thought I'd ask!
-
We are getting brilliant feedback on this, our teams are thoroughly enjoying the ability to see their more urgent jobs in a snap!
-
We are getting brilliant feedback from our teams on this!
-
On 1/10/2019 at 10:31 PM, James Ainsworth said:
We are nearing completion of some work which will provide options for setting some colours for the different priorities. We are hoping that this will be available in an upcoming Service Manager update over the next few weeks. I'll put a final post here once it is available.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
James
James,
This looks brilliant
I've tagged some colleagues to get their input too I'm assuming we will be able to choose our wording for our priorities i.e. we would want High in Red?
-
@Lauren @Gemma Morrison I missed this update on Thursday!
How good does this look!
-
On 1/10/2019 at 11:12 AM, Alisha said:
Hi @James Ainsworth,
Was it possible to get the Info option replicated onto the Sites form?
Many thanks,
Alisha
I think the update Lauren did yesterday has resolved this Alisha?
-
Hi all,
Apologies I was off yesterday and therefore did not pick any of these up.
Thank you for the above, reads as if a fix has been found so we've applied the update and will let you know if not!
Lauren
-
1
-
-
Me again, terrible Tuesday it would appear....
Our team are saying that our customers are continually calling this morning telling us they are receiving multiple resolution emails - i.e. in the BP listed on this request
we have a node which sends an email when a job has been closed after 20minutes. However, our staff are getting the same email EVERY 20minutes and again, we don't know why?!
Thank you in advance,
Lauren and @Gemma Morrison
-
Good afternoon!
We have had an issue raised to our attention whereby requests that have been resolved, and then reopened either by the customer or the analyst, are not then automatically closing as per the business process once secondarily resolved.
We have looked into this previously, and got the error resolved but it appears to be back with a vengeance and I'm just getting fed up of the team keep raising the same issue to me!!
I have attached a screenshot of our BP above, are there any simple issues I am missing? I am BP blind at this stage!
Thanks
Lauren & @Gemma Morrison
-
-
@James Ainsworth with all our assets, as Gemma mentioned above need to be archived rather than deleted as we are still required to run reports off them/see which jobs were linked to them.
-
-
@BobbyB I fear this level of 'notification' would not be enough to signpost people to search T Block rather than Headquarters Essex - T Block as the list would still be too big, even if typing Headquarters Essex!
-
On 11/21/2018 at 11:37 AM, Ehsan said:
@Martyn Houghton Ideally we would avoid recommending a SQL to report on this information when there is a view available in Hornbill to retrieve this information.
Yes that would certainly be ideal, as well as the option to also filter on status. I will share this feedback with the team.
+1
If we (being @Gemma Morrison and I) could get a filter based on the team, or even their line manager, it would be very useful. At the moment it's a lot of 'whose on DND' conversations across the floor!
-
+1
There are certain things that would really benefit from this!
-
Sorry for seeming dense, I was hoping this would disappear when I got rid of the blonde hair!
That is primarily our issue - that the authorisation nodes fail when individuals are not signed into the system. Therefore, if:
QuoteIf your main/only objective is to eliminate the error when the task is created and assigned to the request owner then why not simply add a node prior to task creation which checks if the request has an owner. If it does then go ahead create the task. If it does not then create a small detour, before creating the task, where the request waits for an owner...
alleviates this issue we are laughing and will implement straight away!
-
How would the above process alleviate the authorisation node error, would it do as I suggested on my previous response for OOH?
-
Is there a way in which Round Robin can be time limited?
As an example - could we set working hours of the Round Robin to 8am - 5pm, and this would mean the RR would work as it currently does assigning to the individual within the team automatically and the task being assigned to the team rather than the individual (this is a setting we need to change at the moment, but want to rectify the error first).
Then, during the hours of 5pm - 8am all requests assign to the team and get manually allocated in the morning by the supervisor.
This is no different to how it currently works at the moment, as the RR cannot find anyone to assign to out of hours so they just sit there, but the RR seems to recognise this as a failure and so this is why the task assignment is failing?
We are open to suggestions, anything to keep the error gremlins at bay!
Side note - the refresh of the previous stage does not work on these jobs, I think again, because of no-one being logged in during the time of the job being created.
@Gemma Morrison please elaborate on this if it doesn't make sense!!
-
Is there a way of changing the way things are assigned in and out of hours?
Our old working practice was for the supervisor to assign individual's work throughout the day, but part of the pull of SM was the 'most available' and 'round robin' options as this frees up the supervisor to complete other work.
We would not want to remove this option unless as a last resort as it has saved us so much time!
-
-
Also, congratulations on your promotion to Sith Lord!
I've tagged some colleagues to get their input too 
HORNBILL INSIGHTS 20 – CUSTOMER ROUNDTABLE, MARYLEBONE
in General Non-Product Discussions
Posted
Hello all,
Is there any more information regarding Insight2020 and when we might expect dates to be released?
Thanks
cc @Gemma Morrison @John Delamare-Timms @Will Meekings