Jump to content

Josh Bridgens

Hornbill Users
  • Posts

    214
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Josh Bridgens

  1. You can set accounts to "out of Office" or "On Holiday" which shows up during the assignment of calls.

    image.png.631d4c6cdab78da780d7283148108de0.png

    Ignore the awful covering of names.

    this allows for you to know when someone is away.

     

    This is obviously all dependent on the users staying on top of their status.

     

     

    • Like 1
  2.  

    20 minutes ago, Steven Boardman said:

    We'll post back here once we have a firmer idea of timeframes

    Brilliant, Thank you very much.

    Just a quick one, is the ability to send out multiple update emails in the pipeline?

    A few of the Desk over here have requested this. I have tried to force the "Impacted, interested" however they have found that that works with problems, not "High impact" Incidents.

     

    Once again, thanks for the update. :) 

  3. OK so Im adding an example anyway AFTER we have changed the customer.

    image.thumb.png.238235af1fef9b5f8cc3bccb627c221b.png

     

    All of these calls were logged one after an other by the same person,

     

    Unfortunately they are automatically logged from emails sent from an email address called "ICT Sharepoint" (Don't even go there I've lost that battle once already)

     

    Now I know what your thinking, "why not just have the process do it and change it automatically?"

    That sounds amazing, unfortunately there are 45 different business units which can have up to 4 different "Super Users" who can request these changes.

    Therefore making any automated process null and void because it would require ~140 different processes to cover all bases.

    Hornbill unfortunately does not have the option to pull data from emails, making it EVEN MORE difficult.

     

    I'm just trying to make the Desks lives easier, any thoughts guys? 

    Please? :D 

  4. Hi Guys, my team are finding the multiple request actions extremely useful, however we find ourselves wanting the ability to bulk change the customer, sometimes bulk do tasks etc.

     

    I understand that different requests will be at different tasks so that one would probably be near impossible to implement, however could it be looked into for us to bulk change the customer?

     

    If you need an example of why this would be useful I am happy to provide :)

     

    Josh

  5. 1 minute ago, Gerry said:

    You can reject emails that do not have a recognizable call reference using the Auto Responder.

    Fair point, with the inability to auto respond to emails that fall into a certain category, this would require manual monitoring of the emails to notify we are no longer accepting emails to log calls?

     

    Sorry for the 21 questions!

     

    Josh

  6. We are currently pushing our Self Service Portal and have had a lot of uptake on it, however we are still getting a large number of emails come through to the Service Desk,

    How did people phase out the emails? With no auto reply enabled in SM and too many emails for one person to filter through, what did you do?

     

    We are currently sending any correspondence with the information that we are no longer accepting emails as a form of call logging. We are hesitant to just stop logging the calls for obvious reasons though.

     

    Any ideas would be great!

     

    Josh

  7. @James Ainsworth We are also looking to stopping people relying on emails for logging requests, up until now we have had it automatically logging them, we have had a good number of users using the self service portal but too many people are still emailing.

     

    A way to setup an auto responder AFTER updating already logged calls would be ideal.

     

    We have attempted to notify users that we will not be accepting emails to log calls however it doesn't seem to have stuck and we get more than possible for someone to reply to all of them saying "Please use our self service portal instead"

     

    Is there any way to facilitate this within SM at this point in time?

     

    Josh

  8. 46 minutes ago, Victor said:

    If my understanding is correct perhaps a solution will be to have this task with 2 outcomes: Escalate and Resolve. The analyst will only have to complete this task (as the analyst needs to choose one of these outcomes) for the request to progress on the intended route (escalation or resolution)

    I had a feeling this would be the only way. I will have to attempt it this way and see how the calls go, I was hoping to get away from too much "task-based" procedure for these calls. nevermind.

     

    Thanks for the input!

     

    Josh

  9. 1 minute ago, Victor said:

    sorry, just seeking some clarification, why the need of completing both is not right for what you need to achieve?

    Ideally, I would want it to be Either / Or, not both.

    So, ideally it would work like.... 

     

    "This call is sat in my queue with the option to complete this task If I like... however I will resolve the call. this then completes/cancels the task and progresses to the next step"

    Long story short, We need to stop the reassignment of a lot of calls to certain teams, therefore there has been an executive decision made that calls are ONLY escalated to 1 specific team.

     

    Hopefully im explaining well enough, which I dont think I am :(..... 

×
×
  • Create New...