Adam Toms Posted December 19, 2023 Share Posted December 19, 2023 Hi all, We have had the ability to reopen tickets, which works very well using the older workflows configuration screenshot attached. This seems to be using flowcodes, and I believe for newer work flows the flow codes is not available. Or if it is, I don't seem to be able to find it at all. I've therefore tried to re-create this, but it doesn't seem to reopen the ticket or function as I expected, it doesn't error but it doesn't reopen in the same way as the flowcode setup. Please see the newer workflow configuration screenshot attached, for what I've tried to configure to have a similar behaviour to the flow code configuration. Does anyone have advice on where I'm going wrong or have a better idea, on how to achieve what I'm looking to do? Many Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Giller Posted December 19, 2023 Share Posted December 19, 2023 Firstly, I think the value should be "open" rather than "status.open" Secondly, it's difficult to give any more detail without seeing how you get to the decision node, as that will affect what it's deciding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Toms Posted December 19, 2023 Author Share Posted December 19, 2023 Thanks @Steve Giller For your quick response on this. Apologies that I missed the earlier post in 2021, that you've included. I've largely followed the same configuration as the flowcodes were set, when which we went live. But as this is for a different customer our HR team, as they require a lot less complex workflows than in IT. I created their workflows from scratch and then ran into this. In my head I couldn't see why this wouldn't work. To help with this, I have included how the suspend node is configured, as well as a screenshot showing the outcomes. I note I've used the same configuration in the status is closed. So this must be hitting the no match criteria rather following the two other routes I've created. With this additional information, do you think if I just change this from status.open to open, that will do it? Many Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Giller Posted December 19, 2023 Share Posted December 19, 2023 That would probably work, however the Wait for Status Change node itself outputs the new Status: so it's more efficient to test on that. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Toms Posted December 19, 2023 Author Share Posted December 19, 2023 Thanks @Steve Giller, I will do some testing and see how I get on. Many Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now