Alisha Posted August 17, 2021 Share Posted August 17, 2021 Hello, We would like to use the 'Lock Resolution' for a particular role so that certain analysts can't resolve a request until a Human Task is completed. (We have created roles - without access permissions - to group users in.) Is it possible to achieve this using a Variable? I couldn't find a way to do this. Any help would be much appreciated. Many thanks, Alisha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Giller Posted August 17, 2021 Share Posted August 17, 2021 @Alisha The Access Control options are on or off, they're not selective, with the exception of "... Full Access" and "Service Desk Admin" roles as detailed in the wiki: Quote Use the Access Control to lock or unlock the Details section or the Actions on a request. Only users with the appropriate application right (update locked requests) will be able to modify the details or use an Action once locked. This right has been added to the following roles: Incident Management Full Access, Change Management Full Access, Problem Management Full Access, Release Management Full Access, Service Request Full Access, and Service Desk Admin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alisha Posted August 17, 2021 Author Share Posted August 17, 2021 Hi @Steve Giller, so we're not able to use the Variable option in the 'Lock Resolve'? We have a custom role created that is just used to group users rather than give permissions. We'd like to use this custom role to restrict the Lock Resolve, as many of our analysts already have the Incident Management Full Access, so they would still be able to resolve something when we don't want them to! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Giller Posted August 17, 2021 Share Posted August 17, 2021 @Alisha You can use the Variable option, but not in the way that you're thinking. The parameter requires a boolean value, so supplying a variable with a true/false value will work, but supplying a variable with a value of "naughtyUsersWhoCloseThingsTheyShouldNot" will have unexpected results. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alisha Posted August 17, 2021 Author Share Posted August 17, 2021 Thanks @Steve Giller. Is there another way we can make this work? Apart from removing the Incident Management Full Access role from users? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Giller Posted August 17, 2021 Share Posted August 17, 2021 @Alisha Not that I'm aware of, no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Ainsworth Posted August 17, 2021 Share Posted August 17, 2021 Alisha, I would be interested to know if there are things missing from the Incident Manager User role that is requiring you to give the Incident Management Full Access role to users? As the name suggested, the Incident Management Full Access provides full access and is a great role for team leads or managers. The Incident Manager User role, is more focused on Service Desk staff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now