Jump to content

RyanMesser

Hornbill Users
  • Posts

    53
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by RyanMesser

  1. Hi Steve,

    I checked and we are using the default as you do have as above and the progressive capture hasn't changed, in different browsers its fine but this issue occurs seemingly sporadic so I don't believe it can be anything configuration wise? 

    Ryan

  2. Hi,

    When often doing a thousand things at once, we need to save workflows we are in the progress of making without finishing them, hence being in a draft state. This can mean nodes not setup quite correctly or lines not drawn as we will come back to finish it later. However, we see this slightly confusing message that states we can't save until its completed but that the process has saved which is it or am I not understanding the behaviour? 

    Thanks

    Ryan

    HB .png

  3. Hi,

    We have started to see this issue in Chrome with Hornbill when clicking the raise new button on the analyst portal (see attached image).  

    Other browsers do not have this behavior, and if in Chrome you click the little drop down and select incident,request etc.. then the issue doesn't occur. 

    Thanks

    Ryan

    HB .png

  4. Hi,

    On quite a few occasions now we are stopped by this error message on Automated Tasks that aren't using the Application Type and are using the Entity Type. if it was only a couple of times it wouldn't bother us but we seem to get it continuously and means having to delete the node and recreating it.

     

    image.png.cbe762d850a753eafb8b94c149d32102.png

    image.png.b1eb5e91e1a4e196f891dcfd9f50b722.png

  5. @Steven Boardman Thanks, I don't assign the owner on the assign team node to a specific person as it could be a number of people. However, the way I'm doing it looks a bit over complicated when I could do just an assignment to request creator. I was doing it by taking the Created By in the request details which seems to not add me as an owner as you point out but as a member. I'm going to modify the BPM and see if that helps. 

    Will post back.


    Ryan

  6. Hi,

    In one of our workflows we have an automated task that assigns our support team automatically, this seems to work as indicated by the checkpoint going green and the timeline states its been assigned to the support team. However the assignment part is blank for both assignment of the owner (done by looking at who created the request) and team

    image.thumb.png.682e3167acedfba53f964ef027f4d7d9.png

    image.thumb.png.3b06c7f6ba4d6c63d4ede76fdb3243a2.png

    So i'm a little confused, I'm a member of two teams (IT and Support) could this be why? I believe its just a visual thing as the workflow seems to function OK but could be a little confusing. 

     

    Thanks

     

    Ryan

  7. Hi,

    Odd thing today has happened where I can't see Service Manager as an application to go to in the live portal and manually going to /requests is giving me a 404. I've got Super User role and service desk admin and can usually see the request list/services list. I've tried removing and re-adding permissions but a 404 looks more like an server issue to me?

    Any ideas?
    image.thumb.png.c51508e94ca389ee8c1e4641a3adf6d7.png

  8. Hi @James Ainsworth

    Thanks for that they will be very useful in future. 

    For instance what I'm looking for on the service portal, when a user opens a request and gets asked to input a quote number they are only going to be able to enter one without filling another request. However they may need to input multiple quote numbers which could get painful to raise a request for each one inputting a different quote number in each time. Because this could vary from 1 to whatever ideally we would like to be able for them to press effectively a button similar to Add Item (in screenshot below) so they can add multiple quote numbers in one request. 

    Think I'm making sense there, sounds like it may be a feature request and I suppose we could enter multiple fields and hide them if no value provided but would be nice if there was a way they could add items dynamically from the service portal. 

    image.png.21f7d4333e33d8f366d42c67ddccf581.png

    Thanks

     

    Ryan

  9. Hi, 

    We are having an issue when a basic user raises a request through the service portal. In the BPM after the request is made it automatically assigns the Team (based on the service) and then sends an email to the customer to state that their request has been logged. However we receive the error below. 

    I assume this is because the Basic User doesn't have permission to the mailbox but they can't because they are basic users so how would you respond to a customer automatically unless they are users that have permissions to the mailbox?

    FlowCode Exception (com.hornbill.servicemanager/flowcode/fc_bpm/requestLoggedEmailCustomer): nodeName: Send template email; nodeId: 69de88d9-aad6-4ee4-abdf-3f68d8a5eaed; At 238/1: "Uncaught EspMethodCall:invoke: Operation[mail:sendEntityTemplateMessage] The specified mailbox 'helpdesk' doesn't exist or you have not been granted access to it" throw(e); _fc_node_exec_69de88d9_aad6_4ee4_abdf_3f68d8a5eaed

     

  10. Hi, 

    This may well be a feature request but wanted to make sure first, we have other apps that capture signatures as often required by Customers when we have an incident or request that has been completed. We use the signature also as a point of evidence. 

    Is there any functionality to capture this information?

    Ryan

  11. I would think EWS would help, MAPI also (i think there is one implementation of it running on Linux). 

    As I said I wouldn't follow the thread that you attached, it didn't work and I can sort of see why so the steps I described would be the best approach I think.  

    Thanks for the assistance all resolved now but will keep an eye out for potential EWS implementation. 

    Thanks

    Ryan

×
×
  • Create New...