Jump to content

will.good

Hornbill Users
  • Posts

    245
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by will.good

  1. 4 hours ago, will.good said:

    Thanks @James Ainsworth,

    We'd like a way to be able to either set a retention period or a select all to be able to delete them. We don't use the HUD on requests so would not be missing this and if we need to refer back to a request we just use the timeline.

    It seems like we could have quite a significant space-saving by not keeping these which we would value more.

    Could one of HB Staff tag this as an enhancement based on this comment please?

  2. 9 hours ago, James Ainsworth said:

    Just to confirm that the workflow instances do count toward the data quota.  The question from here possibly turns to value and if there is value in maintaining the workflow tracker at the top of the request for historical reasons vs saving some space.

    Thanks @James Ainsworth,

    We'd like a way to be able to either set a retention period or a select all to be able to delete them. We don't use the HUD on requests so would not be missing this and if we need to refer back to a request we just use the timeline.

    It seems like we could have quite a significant space-saving by not keeping these which we would value more.

  3. HI,

    We have seen some emails that are not formatting properly in the inbox, they come through in Courier New Font and don't wrap to the message preview window meaning you have to scroll sideways to view the email.

    This never happened in the old UI. Can this be fixed please?

  4. Hi,

    A very minor ask - but something we find fairly annoying.

    Can all system lists in Hornbill please be sorted alphabetically - e.g. this list of fields from Service Manager reporting.

    Would make finding things so much easier.

    In the below we go from C to D to L to D - it just doesnt make any sense

    image.thumb.png.6ba672b90a3f06c5d608ad18c06c699b.png

    image.png.3e98ece1a980d6894a0ce382e3755b52.png

  5. Hi,

    Whilst the resolution text box now supports wiki mark up, when sending the resolution text out by email, the wiki mark up is not included, and it shows the unformatted text...

    Not sure if this is an oversight but seems a little bit odd?

  6. Hi,


    Can we raise an enhancement to add times to System Exclusions on the Working Time Calendars?

    Use case would be where we have different opening hours (for a Bank Holiday for example) we could add a Holiday in from 16:00–23:59 so that Live Chat could close at that time.

    We have this currently in our Telephony provider - just means we can add in days when we might have different opening hours all in one go rather than having to amend the Working Time Calendar to cater for early closures/ late openings (and then to remember to change it back!)

    This is how we would enter it for our telephony system

    image.png.418b3f7688241826363e44e52a42f22d.png

  7. Hi,

    We have an intermittent bug with Live Chat.

    When a customer raises a LC, and it then is accepted by an analyst, sometimes this does not load for the customer so they still see the spinning HB logo whilst the agent is sending messages to the chat thread.


    We haven't been able to replicate this on demand but have seen multiple customers mentioning this (this even happened when we were doing a demo of LC to a partner department, but we thought nothing of it at the time)

     

    Has anyone else had any problems?

  8. 6 minutes ago, Claire Holtham said:

    New issue with forwarded emails-  Timeline incomplete.

    If I open an email from the call timeline, and forward it on with the thread included, plus some new text. Then I send it to the customer  & I include our service desk.

    I'd expect it to not only email out the customer, but also update the timeline and append the email to the call. 

    What it does is: append the email to the call (all of it), email the customer, but, it only partly updates the timeline - on the timeline it shows the forwarded text, but not the new text I added. 

     

    I hope this is clear...

     

    We're having the same issue here

  9. I'm nitpicking here - but it's a minor annoyance.

    The request list header bar doesn't sit flush to the top, so there is a small gap where you can see things flying past when scrolling down the request list image.thumb.png.0055fb787a0e549e763145295709fb1e.png

    Could I also ask that columns auto size correctly when the page first loads? It's not easy on the eyes when column width is changing as you're scrolling down the list

  10. Hi,

    We are also seeing issues with some email formatting in the new UI - some emails do not format correctly.

    I can't share any examples on here, but they come through to our inbox with the wrong font (courier new) and the text is not wrapped to the preview window, meaning we have to scroll sideways to read the remaining text.

  11. Hi,

    Sorry, this may seem like a lot to ask for, but I don't think any of these would be overly difficult to implement? 😜

     

    When filtering via Service Manager Category and Closure Category, it appears to be using the code ID rather than the Code Name, despite having to select the code name from the profile tree.

    This has caused issues for us this week as we have reimported our profile tree where we have updated a load of the Code ID's (but none of the Code Names)

    Could the filtering be changed so that it looks at the Code Name instead of the Code ID?

     

    Additionally, could I also raise an enhancement for the closure category filtering to include the below options which are on the category filter:

    image.png.7caddff3db4ff2f9c468938d63925993.png

    Currently, it only contains Is and Is Not

    image.thumb.png.e518989ea3b3dbfcc62326ce0f2d541b.png

    Also, it (I think) could work better if the contains and does not contain filter options are free text rather than having to select a profile code? Currently, we use Service Manager Reporting to use wildcard filters such as looking for codes that contain the word '%performance%', whereas this could be done on the service manager filtering instead which allows you to open any requests there and then from the request view. Not only is this an easier way to filter but means you get matches across different codes rather than having to select multiple codes from the coding tree and filter seperately.

  12. Hi all,

    We are looking to drive more of our customer base to use Self Service instead of telephony / email to contact us. Currently, about 25% of our contacts are through SS.

    All of our internal customers have access to our Employee Portal.

    As much as I would (really) love to, we cannot turn off email / telephony for a number of reasons, mainly because we deal with a lot of Sensitive/HR stuff that is best over the phone and also our Pre Hire employees don't get access to Hornbill until their hire date has passed (something we are working on changing)

     

    Does anyone have any top tips from when they have shifted people over? What's worked/ what hasn't and the impact this has had on your teams? We have been live with Hornbill for just over 2 years now and whilst we have seen a natural uptake of portal usage, we are looking to really push this in 2024!

    • Like 1
  13. Hi,


    Have raised here as not sure if a bug with just our instance or not.

    image.png.0d0160af2d7aef58b0919a74f65832a0.png


    When typing @ and then the name of the person we wish to mention, it takes about 7–8 seconds to load

    image.png.a62f6b9d11eb883c8902e14a92516694.png

    Is there anything that can be done to speed this up? We find not many of our team use it due to the time it takes to load.

×
×
  • Create New...