dwalby Posted July 5, 2018 Share Posted July 5, 2018 Hi all, This is going to be a little difficult for me to explain... When working in the Request Config section of a Service, it allows you to View Details Form and design the form by adding custom fields, etc. I've designed a form for a particular Service which contains a custom field - Custom A, but when attempting to design a form for another Service Custom A's display label is the same, can this be edited without affecting the config in the other Service? Hope this makes sense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victor Posted July 5, 2018 Share Posted July 5, 2018 6 minutes ago, dwalby said: display label is the same, can this be edited without affecting the config in the other Service? @dwalby the answer is: Yes, it can be safely edited. However the label should not be the same as the one from teh other service when adding the field...I'll ask dev team to look into this... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dwalby Posted July 5, 2018 Author Share Posted July 5, 2018 Thanks @Victor Another question... maybe one for @Steven Boardman as he's just replied on the other thread in relation to this. I've noticed the Change Request details form has pre-defined fields available, is it possible to automatically map ProgCap answers to the Change Request details form using the concepts outlined here? https://wiki.hornbill.com/index.php/Mapping_Fields_from_Customised_Forms I can't see a mention of the pre-defined Change Request fields in the wiki but assume it'd be a case of mapping to the fields such as h_implementation_plan for example? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dwalby Posted July 12, 2018 Author Share Posted July 12, 2018 Following on from this, I've setup a ProgCap with a custom form that maps the completed form answers to Custom Fields within a Custom Details Form. Strangely it seems to be skipping one of the field mappings and messing up the ordering of the form. As you can see below, the ProgCap for this field maps to h_custom_b This should then map to the below Custom Field within the Details Form. As you can see the field in the form is blank but has mapped the ProgCap answer to the field below (Number of people affected which is h_custom_c) Any ideas why this might be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victor Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 @dwalby - indeed it does not look right.. I'll have a look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dwalby Posted July 12, 2018 Author Share Posted July 12, 2018 @Victor - I think it's something to do with the fact I'm using the same BPM for 2 separate Catalog Items as it successfully maps the fields for one Catalog Item but not the other... Will update if I find out what it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victor Posted July 12, 2018 Share Posted July 12, 2018 1 minute ago, dwalby said: I'm using the same BPM for 2 separate Catalog Items @dwalby well that would explain a few things ... Let me know what you find... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dwalby Posted July 13, 2018 Author Share Posted July 13, 2018 @Victor strangely on second attempt of logging a request of this type the fields mapped correctly, weird. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now