[Question display field]

Hi Victor, 

Thanks for the quick reply. Is this known to be an intermittent issue or affected by multiple factors, as I have examples where the labels have not broken the pagination (I've learned a new word, i like it) and so we discounted it as a reason?

Regards

[Question display field]

Hi all,  

Looking at the results of some of our progressive capture self-service jobs, it shows varying amounts of questions and answers before having to click to the next page to view more. Attached is an example of one question showing on its own with 7 questions on page 2. 

We have looked at everything structurally in the PCF that we can think of (branches, questions that are just labels, hidden things) and none seem to have any repeatable impact. 

Does any one know why the page breaks occur in seemingly random places?

[One progressive capture, multiple BPMs?]

Revelation: Our BPM skips all the unused tasks but still displays the checkpoints from those tasks (all currently optional). This still looks bad.

[One progressive capture, multiple BPMs?]

Hello everyone who tagged along on this thread, 

We've found a setting, below, that means if a stage isn't used within the BPM, it does not show in the stage timeline visualisation. 

app.bpm.display.skippedstages.hide
Hide stages in the BPM HUD once they have been skipped

It's working for us so far .

Regards 

[Business Process nodes moving when linking together]

Dragging a node arrow to link it to another, has started moving the whole node (while the arrow flails about stuck to the side). It still links but you then have to move the node back into place. 

I have been making PCFs and BPMs pretty consistently for a few weeks and have noticed it starting on 23/5/18

[One progressive capture, multiple BPMs?]

Background info: I am converting many branching BPMs from an older system and the stage structure does not lend itself for different process paths. I know you can jump to further stages but this leaves the analyst with breaks in the stage-visualisation (picture attached) and condenses information by including everything. In this case the greyed out section is everything for a different type of order, currently defined in the first stage. 

Can you exclude stages in the visualisation or can you link out to different, more specialised, BPMs based on the answer in a single progressive capture?

 

Many thanks in advance

 

[How to decide a path based on an answer in a progressive capture]

How can I automate two outcomes in a Business Process based on the answer to a question in a Progressive Capture?

I thought it may be

1. Making the capture complete a custom field with the variable answer

2. Have the BPM make a decision about what was based in that field. 

This did not work, so if this is a solution I've implemented it incorrectly. 

Thanks in advance.