Dan Munns Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 Hi all, I have just logged a test ticket and noticed that the timers are incorrect. I am using Corporate Service Level Agreements. The SLAs are set as a Response time of 1 hour, Resolution time of 5 days but as soon as I logged the ticket and assigned it the Response timer showed as failed. The resolution is set to be completed by 03/03/17 which is obviously a good deal longer than 5 days (I would have expected it to be 22/02/17) Please see attached images for setup. Any ideas? Thanks Dan
Steve Giller Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 Looks like it could be a time zone or daylight saving issue.
Dan Munns Posted February 16, 2017 Author Posted February 16, 2017 1 minute ago, DeadMeatGF said: Looks like it could be a time zone or daylight saving issue. But even if the time zone was incorrect the resolution timer should still be the correct day. At the moment it is 7 days over...
Steve Giller Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 Sorry, missed the resolution bit - that's easy, the time needs to be measured in hours. Having it set at 5 days will be 5 x 24 = 120 hours, and the system will take into account the working time calendar so that's 120 working hours which will be approximately 12 days.
Dan Munns Posted February 16, 2017 Author Posted February 16, 2017 (edited) Surely though it should be set a 5 working days. The old SLA system used to be correct at 5 working days for a 5 day SLA. EDIT: Ok so having tested that you are correct. A 5 day SLA has to be set at 2 days 2 hours to expire in 5 working days. Can any Hornbill guys explain why the change? Edited February 16, 2017 by Dan Munns Test conclusion
Victor Posted February 17, 2017 Posted February 17, 2017 @Dan Munns it was always like this as far as I remember... time set on SLA configuration is calendar time... so 1 day on SLA configuration = 24 hours....this is then divided with you working hours/day, depending on your SLC configuration and this is the number of days on SLA target on the request... EDIT: and if I would have waited to finish my coffee and read the thread properly I would have noticed @DeadMeatGF already mentioned this...oh well...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now