Keith Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 Current functionality allows analysts to use the resolve action at any point in the process irrespective of stages and check points. This means that potentially analysts can resolve before any assignment, categorisation etc. has taken place. This really doesn't make sense to me. Why should you be able to resolve an incident prior to completion of all required information. We would like the resolve action to NOT be actionable until specific stages or check points (defined in the business process) have been met. Thanks! Keith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Munns Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 Hi Keith, Have a read of the post here: You can remove the workflow buttons as I mentioned around halfway down the post which will stop your analysts skipping around the workflows. You can also set task completion to be mandatory with the setting "webapp.view.ITSM.serviceDesk.requests.resolve.denyWithOpenActivities" as mentioned by Bob in the post below mine. Hope that helps Dan 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith Posted October 13, 2016 Author Share Posted October 13, 2016 @Dan Munns Thanks for the tip, however that only works if there are open activities with the analyst which for my process is not the case. I appreciate I could probably add an activity to the end of the process flow but this seems counter intuitive. If I have a stage called resolution (as a third stage) it seems crazy that I can actually resolve the incident before reaching that stage. To help with things a little we have enabled an option to force a closure category to at least be set before resolving. Keith 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Ainsworth Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 Hi Keith, Thanks for your post. You may have seen that within a Service's configuration you are able to hide or show particular action items such as the resolution action item. We have discussed in the past about providing a way that these action items could be hidden or displayed depending on where you are within a BPM workflow. Is this the kind of thing that would help you? Regards, James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samwoo Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Hi @Keith and @James Ainsworth I created this post a little while back: With regards to @James Ainsworth's response, my idea from the post above was to add the ability to disable actions with any of the Task Nodes, but having an entirely individual node just for this purpose works just as well. This would be a benefit so that once you get to a part of the stage where you will allow users to be able to resolve the call you can simply enable the Resolve Call button so it will be visible to the analyst. Thanks, Samuel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith Posted October 17, 2016 Author Share Posted October 17, 2016 Hi @James Ainsworth (and @samwoo ) The ability to hide the resolution action item and trigger its visibility in the BPM workflow would be a perfect and logical solution. This way I would simply activate it within the appropriate stage's workflow. Regards Keith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Munns Posted October 17, 2016 Share Posted October 17, 2016 Hi Keith, In the mean time you can still hide the resolution action button from the analysts (as mentioned in the post I linked earlier) that way the only way they can close the call is to complete the entire workflow. I do agree that I way to hide it/show it at set times during the BPM is better though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex8000 Posted October 17, 2016 Share Posted October 17, 2016 On 13-10-2016 at 5:37 PM, Keith said: To help with things a little we have enabled an option to force a closure category to at least be set before resolving. Hi Keith, That's great! How long ago has this been added? I must've missed it in the patch notes. Thanks, Alex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nasimg Posted October 17, 2016 Share Posted October 17, 2016 We noticed you could make closure categories mandatory around 1st September.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith Posted October 17, 2016 Author Share Posted October 17, 2016 1 hour ago, Dan Munns said: Hi Keith, In the mean time you can still hide the resolution action button from the analysts (as mentioned in the post I linked earlier) that way the only way they can close the call is to complete the entire workflow. I do agree that I way to hide it/show it at set times during the BPM is better though. Hi, @Dan Munns I'm new to this so may be being a bit dumb. How would analysts resolve the issue if the button is hidden? Regards Keith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith Posted October 17, 2016 Author Share Posted October 17, 2016 1 hour ago, Alex8000 said: Hi Keith, That's great! How long ago has this been added? I must've missed it in the patch notes. Thanks, Alex Hi @Alex8000, no idea when this came in but you can set it via servicemanager.request.closureCategory.default.required Regards Keith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex8000 Posted October 17, 2016 Share Posted October 17, 2016 Hi Keith, You would be able to do this through the BPM entirely. This way a request would only be closed whenever all tasks have been completed and all other required steps were done and this is verified by the BPM. Regards, Alex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Munns Posted October 17, 2016 Share Posted October 17, 2016 Hi Keith, Alex is correct. I have added a 'suspend - wait for resolution' node in our BPMs which, when all previous steps are complete, moves to show the resolution text box and presents the analysts with the option to resolve the call. The call is then closed 2 days later, provided that the end user is happy and the fault is in fact fully resolved (by use of another node). I have attached a simple demo BPM example 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now