Michael Sharp Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 Can someone please help me establish why this request isn't showing as per the filter? I also have a SQL query driving the widget on my wallboard which is able to pick them up successfully as follows: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Giller Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 Without checking the database I can't be sure, but as the Request has breached the Response time then I would expect that Within Response Time is now set (to false) and preventing the filter picking it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Sharp Posted March 30, 2021 Author Share Posted March 30, 2021 @Steve Giller how can I get a request filter to show outstanding first responses? I'm sure this has changed because that would mean the "mark" is happening automatically without being invoked by the BPM? Mike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Sharp Posted March 30, 2021 Author Share Posted March 30, 2021 @Steve Giller within response time field as below for that request is now set to 0. Others that are outstanding are set to NULL: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Giller Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 From that info it would appear to confirm that "Marking" a response is not that same as the request breaching - the h_withinresponse is marked as failed as soon as it's passed (so the indicator goes red) but the "Mark" action records the time the response was made etc. I suspect that Boards would be a better mechanism for the view you're trying to achieve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Sharp Posted March 30, 2021 Author Share Posted March 30, 2021 @Steve Giller are you able to confirm if this is a behavioural change introduced with the modern SLA functionality? We have only recently moved to this and our request filter used to work. Don't really want to have to go down the route of boards if I'm not forced to really as the request list is where my coordinators "live". Mike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Sharp Posted March 30, 2021 Author Share Posted March 30, 2021 @Steve Giller I've had a go with boards which I can see merit in but confused as to how they're working. I've set an escalation action to add to a board list if within an hour of breach. Problem is when the first response has been cleared/marked, it remains on the board. Bit confused by this? Also I can't find a BPM action that allow me to remove requests from boards which I thought may help? Also is it possible to have a request on more than one list e.g. SLA breach imminent, VIP requests (BPM driven)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Hall Posted March 31, 2021 Share Posted March 31, 2021 @Michael SharpI've just reviewed this and can see the reason. To clarify, the h_withinresponse value (and h_withinfix value) are only set when the target is confirmed as being within or outside of the target time. This has always been the case and continues to be so. Regarding your question on this request, if I read the screenshot correctly, the target response time was 12:05, the target was missed and then at 12:06 the SLA was changed which altered the time to an hour ahead. In this scenario because the target had been missed at the point at which the SLA was changed, we set the h_withinresponse to 0 hence why it will not be appearing in the results. If the SLA change was made before the target time then the value would have remained as null. Hope that clears it up, Kind Regards, Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now