Martyn Houghton Posted March 3, 2021 Share Posted March 3, 2021 Can we raise an enhancement request for the Progressive Capture 'Field Settings' for the Date & Time Control to add an additional optional validation to allow it to be checked/compared to another datetime field, i.e. the current field is greater than an other field. We are trying to ensure user when entering two datetime fields for the start and end of the change request, the end if later than the start. Cheers Martyn 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emily Patrick Posted August 27, 2021 Share Posted August 27, 2021 +1 - We're finding similar with our change requests. At present, change raisers are able to select the start of their change on say, for example, the 3rd September, and the planned end date of the change is the 2nd September, for example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emily Patrick Posted August 27, 2021 Share Posted August 27, 2021 As I was writing the above, I had the idea based from another conditional date setting, that could delay the time they could chose by a period of time, by setting it as an override. For example, we have a 2 or 5 day lead time on certain types of changes, before they can be implemented from the time they are raised. We are able to delay the first day they can select by using an override, as in the below image: I'm looking at setting a delay in the date range on an end date field settings to be 5.04 (0.04 is a 1/24th i.e. 1 hour in decimal form) so that the earliest end date they can select is an hour after the start date. I'm just not sure what I would need to put in the 'If The Following Is True' section to get it validate/work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now