Rashid.Ahmed Posted February 8, 2021 Posted February 8, 2021 https://wiki.hornbill.com/index.php?title=Service_Manager_Business_Process_Workflow#Request_Timers Hi, This forum was particularly helpful with another config change query I had, I was hoping to everyone's brains again? Request Timers; we've recently looked to apply this new enhancement via Application Settings, we have looked to pause the timer on resolve, restart the timer on re-open or end timer on close. We've however found that calls that have been resolved, though they appear as paused seem to also show as 'Timer ongoing' and don't seem to end on close. Our BPM's conditions for resolution timers are: • We do not mark the Resolve Timer as complete – it marks automatically when the call is resolved. • We have chosen to mark the response timer as complete when an analyst is assigned to the call. This is not the same as when the customer is contacted but does give us a measure of how quickly calls are picked up and assessed. Via the Application Settings i understand that only one of either pause on resolve or stop on close can be enable. Will we need to make changes to our BPM to be able to pause the timer on resolve and also have it continue if it gets reopened? Regards Rashid MKC
James Ainsworth Posted February 8, 2021 Posted February 8, 2021 Hi Rashid, Thanks for your post. 5 hours ago, Rashid.Ahmed said: We've however found that calls that have been resolved, though they appear as paused seem to also show as 'Timer ongoing' and don't seem to end on close. I believe that I may have replicated what you are experiencing with the display saying Timer ongoing after it has been closed. I'll check with development to see if there is an issue there. 5 hours ago, Rashid.Ahmed said: Will we need to make changes to our BPM to be able to pause the timer on resolve and also have it continue if it gets reopened? You shouldn't have to make changes to your BPM if you are using these settings. 1
Rashid.Ahmed Posted February 9, 2021 Author Posted February 9, 2021 Hi James, Thank you for your quick reply I think one of the settings that I didn't enable was app.request.stopresolutiontimeronclose setting I will try this tonight and will update yourself via this post on the result. Do let me know if you get any info back from the Dev team, though this additional change to the setting may fix this issue i'm having (fingers crossed) Regards Rashid
Rashid.Ahmed Posted February 10, 2021 Author Posted February 10, 2021 Hi James, We gave this a go last night and unfortunately it still keep the resolution timer ticking even after the call is closed Below is an image showing the settings we enabled (basically matching the image you provided earlier) , what the status of the resolution timer looked like at each stage of the call and finally the report (after the call was closed) confirming the fact that Hornbill still doesn't the resolution has been met. Any advice on how we can get past this issue would be really appreciated Regards Rashid
David Hall Posted February 11, 2021 Posted February 11, 2021 Hi @Rashid.Ahmed Thanks for posting back, I've been having a look into this issue following James' comment and it looks like there may be an issue when using the settings rather than BPM to mark the resolve time on resolution. I'm currently investigating and will post an update back here as soon as I have confirmed the issue and have a way forward. Kind Regards, Dave. 1
Rashid.Ahmed Posted February 11, 2021 Author Posted February 11, 2021 2 hours ago, David Hall said: Hi @Rashid.Ahmed Thanks for posting back, I've been having a look into this issue following James' comment and it looks like there may be an issue when using the settings rather than BPM to mark the resolve time on resolution. I'm currently investigating and will post an update back here as soon as I have confirmed the issue and have a way forward. Kind Regards, Dave. Thanks for investigating this David! Regards Rashid
David Hall Posted February 11, 2021 Posted February 11, 2021 Hi @Rashid.Ahmed Just an update, I've identified the issue which sadly does occur when just using the settings as you have configured. I've implemented a fix for this and we'll get that included in the next Service Manager update (build > 2143). Kind Regards, Dave.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now