Dan Munns Posted July 28, 2020 Posted July 28, 2020 Hi all, I have a BPM that updates the description field from custom fields. This all worked fine before I went on leave and now it seems to have stopped. I haven't changed anything and I cant work out why it isn't working. Basically I map questions to a text block and stick it all in custom field 40, Delivery team: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","Delivery_Team")] Change type: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","Type_of_change")] Change title: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","Change_Title")] Change description: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","h_description")] Sponsor: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","Sponsor")] Group entity: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","Group_Entity")] Business area: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","Business_Area")] Problem statement: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","Problem_Statement")] High level requirements: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","High_Level_Requirements")] Known cost: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","Known_Cost")] Known cost description: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","Known_Cost_Desc")] Known tangible benefit: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","Known_Tangible_Benefit")] Known tangible benefit description: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","Known_Tangible_Desc")] depending on what questions they answered and what dynamic questions they were presented with, I may also map data to custom fields 39 and 38. This is then all used to update the description like this (I use decision nodes to add 39 and 38 if required): &[global["flowcoderefs"]["resultRef"]["customField40"]] &[global["flowcoderefs"]["resultRef"]["customField39"]] &[global["flowcoderefs"]["resultRef"]["customField38"]] Thing is our IT Change form is part of this and still works (this is mapped to custom 40): Change type: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","Change_Type_IT")] Change title: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","Change_Title")] Change description: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","h_description")] Reason for change: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","Reason_IT")] Consequence of NOT doing the change: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","Consequence_No_Change_IT")] Proposed date & time of implementation: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","Proposed_Date_Time_IT")] Business impact: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","Business_Impact_IT")] Impact assessment: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","IA_IT")] Business risk: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","Risk_IT")] Risk assessment: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","Risk_Assessment_IT")] Back out process: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","Back_Out_IT")] Backup details: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","Back_Up_IT")] Outage details: &[functions.pcf("Change_Control","Outage_Details_IT")] I would have thought that even if the variables were blank the custom field would still contain the text I have entered. Here is a screen shot of the workflow (for those sadistic people) issue area highlighted in red. Ignore the yellow triangle, its because I have maths in there: Any ideas? Thanks
ArmandoDM Posted July 28, 2020 Posted July 28, 2020 Hi @Dan Munns does the description gets populated with the custom field 38 and 39 ? Is the issue only with custom field 40 ? Regards Armando
Dan Munns Posted July 28, 2020 Author Posted July 28, 2020 @ArmandoDM It doesn't seem to be populated from any, but 40 is the constant one (always used)
ArmandoDM Posted July 29, 2020 Posted July 29, 2020 Hi @Dan Munns I will report this issue for investigation and fix. Apologies for the inconvenience. Regards Armando
ArmandoDM Posted July 29, 2020 Posted July 29, 2020 Hi @Dan Munns we identified an issue with h_custom_40 not being populated. The issue has been addressed and fixed and it will be available with the next build. As far the custom fields 38, 39 we were unable to replicate the issue, so should it happen again please let us know cause we need to investigate deeper under which conditions these 2 custom field are not populated. Regards Armando 1 1
NickH Posted July 29, 2020 Posted July 29, 2020 Apologies to hijack as this may not be relevant, but why does Custom_39 have a different naming convention?
ArmandoDM Posted July 30, 2020 Posted July 30, 2020 Hi @NickH its not a different naming convention, just a typo in the display name for that custom field. Thank you for reporting this, we'll amend it. Regards Armando
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now