Jump to content

How long is 50 hours?


Guest Paul Alexander

Recommended Posts

Guest Paul Alexander

If I put '50' in the hours box of and expire period option in a BPM node, how long does this expiry time last?

Our working hours are 10 hours a day, 5 days a week (as used in our working calendar). So 50 hours is 5 X 10, which is 5 working days. But if I add 50 to the hours section, these requests never seem to move on......I'm now assuming that there is a limit to what I should put in here?

image.png.2fef55a55d58b246b4263c28e7156431.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Paul Alexander

@Victor

Yup...I have seen that before BUT....it does say: 

"We advise to always configure hours (rather than days) as it is easier to figure out the values required to be configured for SLA targets or expiry times on business process nodes. However, in certain areas (e.g. SLA timers), depending on the target, it might not be always possible to use hours exclusively. "

 

I can't see anywhere on there that mentions needing to put zeros in if a field is blank though? If HHH is correct, that is why my 'expiry' isn't working? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Paul Alexander

Hello

Yes, 1 hour works.....however I have instances of BPM's which have been stuck at this point since 29 Jan this year...

image.thumb.png.d5ce8f6b46efd7a83ffe16a99bafe197.png

 

image.thumb.png.a4fca2dbdce7ace291cffd39537473e7.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aaaaaa..... 29th of Jan!! .... in Hornbill time this is like Jurassic !!! :D 

In this case I don't think there is an issue with the expiry configuration, more like a number of defects regarding how "suspend" nodes handle the expiry outcomes, meaning there were scenarios when the expiry was not set correctly which means that particular section is now in a continuous loop. Each loop lasts 50 hours. I do see how one might think it has not expired but I am quite certain it did, but it just looped back to wait for another 50 hours because of broken expiry and so on... The defects I mentioned were fixed in subsequent SM updates, I don't expect to have this scenario on any recent requests...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...