Martyn Houghton Posted December 24, 2018 Share Posted December 24, 2018 Following on from our example in @samwoo post below, we would like the ability to override the system default for the visibility of emails applied to the Service Request timeline via the Email Routing Rules. We have the system setting default as customer, which is what we want for the majority of our emails, however for internal emails, as well as not updating the status of the request we also want to override the visibility in the rule that processed these messages to be 'Team'. Cheers Martyn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann-MarieHolloway Posted January 2, 2019 Share Posted January 2, 2019 We had something similar to users requesting us to release mails that have been held by our mailgates. If the user had an out of office alert on and was notifiied that a mail had been held, it would automatically log a call. We then amended the routing rule to subject LIKE 'RE: Mail Held%' instead and this did the trick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martyn Houghton Posted September 10, 2019 Author Share Posted September 10, 2019 @James Ainsworth @Steven Boardman Are they any plans to add the ability to override the default timeline visibility setting in the Routing Rule options, so that we can detect internal emails and set these as Team and not the default Customer? Cheers Martyn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HHH Posted September 10, 2019 Share Posted September 10, 2019 +1 for allowing override of timeline visibility 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Cotterell Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 +1 for us too please, for allowing override of timeline visibility. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Paul Alexander Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 +1 for being able to change the visibility when an email is received Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martyn Houghton Posted October 4, 2019 Author Share Posted October 4, 2019 @James Ainsworth & @Steven Boardman Any update on this, as it is quite an important functionality gap, in being able to use routing rules in a piratical way, especially when dealing with external customers or third party integrations. Cheers Martyn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now