Martyn Houghton Posted June 21, 2017 Posted June 21, 2017 @James Ainsworth Is there an precedence applied where you have both Global and Service based Sub Statuses? The reason for asking is that as we are implementing a number of different Service Desks with the same platform, where we will have a large majority of our services (100+) where we will wan to set common Global Sub-Statuses, but also have a number of other Services where we would want different Sub-Statuses. At the moment I believe you will get Global Sub-Statuses plus any local Service based ones as well. It would be good to have the option to turn off either as a whole or individually the inheritance of the Global Sub-Statuses at the Service Level. Also as Sub-Statuses will not doubt be closely aligned with 'Service Levels' it would be good to be able to potentially link Sub-Statuses at this level, so you do not have to apply it at 'Service' level. Cheers Martyn
James Ainsworth Posted June 21, 2017 Posted June 21, 2017 Hi Martyn, I agree that you should be able to turn off a global sub-status on an individual service. I'll raise a change to have this looked at. Regards, James
Martyn Houghton Posted June 22, 2017 Author Posted June 22, 2017 @James Ainsworth Thanks, that would be a great help. Cheers Martyn
Martyn Houghton Posted June 23, 2017 Author Posted June 23, 2017 @James Ainsworth After working on sub-statuses quite a bit over the last couple of days, I coming to the conclusion that actually it would be better to have the ability to attached Sub-Statuses to services the same way you do with new Service Levels. Cheers Martyn
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now