Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'variable'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


  • Hornbill Platform and Applications
    • OpenForWork
    • Announcements
    • Blog Article Discussions
    • General Non-Product Discussions
    • Application Beta Program
    • Collaboration
    • Employee Portal
    • Service Manager
    • IT Operations Management
    • Project Manager
    • Supplier Manager
    • Customer Manager
    • Document Manager
    • Timesheet Manager
    • Live Chat
    • Board Manager
    • Mobile Apps
    • System Administration
    • Integration Connectors, API & Webhooks
    • Performance Analytics
    • Hornbill Switch On & Implementation Questions
    • GRC Manager
  • About the Forum
    • Announcements
    • Suggestions and Feedback
    • Problems and Questions
  • Gamers Club's Games
  • Gamers Club's LFT

Find results in...

Find results that contain...

Date Created

  • Start


Last Updated

  • Start


Filter by number of...


  • Start








Website URL





Found 15 results

  1. Can we request an enhancement to the progressive capture 'Field Flags' conditions capability. At the moment you can enter conditions for static values, but we would like to be able to apply conditions against other variable (values) within the progressive capture. For example we have a form which capture a Change Request Period Start and End date/time fields, so we want to check they are both populated and compare the two values against each other. Cheers Martyn
  2. Is there any update on the fix being deployed for the Known Issue KE00163927, in relation the the Service ID variable not being populated for conditional fields and decision nodes in the progressive capture? Cheers Martyn
  3. Can we raise an enhancement for the Change Request > Update Request > Add to Change Calendar, to allow the insertion of a variable Date/Time field, as at the moment it can only be hard coded. We are capturing a proposed start and end time in a progressive capture and want to schedule the change request to the supplied period. I not sure how you would even use a the current node in the BPM with a hard coded date/time. Cheers Martyn
  4. When attempting to implement the Drop Box integration process and use the insertion of variables rather than hard-coding the filename, the node fails validation when you inject variables as the dialog is attempting to evaluate and check the files exists in real time, when the variables are not populated. Therefore you are then not able to validate and publish the BPM. Cheers Martyn
  5. Can the 'Update Request' option under 'Request>Update Request' please be enabled to allow the priority to be injected as a variable, as it is hard coded at the moment. Cheers Martyn
  6. Hi I'm trying to use a range of dates collected from one condition (date logged) in a second condition (date resolved). I've given the variable a reference, but I can't use it in the other contion The end result is that I'm trying to write a report that is: grouped by day, cases opened, and cases resolved, within a range of dates. Shown on a bar chart. (Case turnover) Is this possible please?
  7. I am attempting to use the Update Request > Closure Category with the Variable option, but even though I am inject the variable exactly as the code is shown in the Data>Profile the category is not updated. I have set the node to do a system and manual timeline update to help debug the issue, but nothing appears, so it look like the node is just not doing anything. Code shown in mandatory field from the Human Task outcome (Yellow) and timeline entry should be between Outcome and Email entries. Closure category present Can you please advise why the node is not working or even failing. Cheers Martyn
  8. Related to be earlier post about being able to pre-fill resolution information on a request (link below), I am attempting to workaround this whilst it is considered. However I have hit the issue that the current 'Update Request > Closure Category' is hard coded. To avoid having to create a sting of decision nodes, can the the Closure Category' node be update to allow the injection of a variable for the closure category, either/or both the Raw Value (Code) or Textual value. Cheers Martyn
  9. To avoid having to hard code numerous 'Assign to Request Creator' nodes in our generic BPM workflow, can the 'Team' property on the node be enhanced to allow the insertion of variables as well as manual selection. I have tried assign it to the team before hand and leaving the value as 'Auto' but this does not work and causes the workflow to break. Cheers Martyn
  10. elated to my post regarding 'Suspend and Wait Feedback' (link at the bottom of this post), can all the Suspend Node be updated to allow the insertion of separate variables into the Expire Period values for Years, Month, Days, Hours and Mins. This will provide flexibility to set different Expiry periods without having to hard code in the BPM with multiple decision nodes. Cheers Martyn
  11. Can the Service and Priority options in the 'Log New Incident' node under 'Requests>Log Request' be setup to support variables, the same way as the 'Catalog Item' option is. Thanks Martyn
  12. Hi all, I have an issue when using variable &[global["flowcode"]["assignedTeam"]] as the authorisation owner for any authorisation task. I set the option to use a variable, select the variable, save and publish the BPM. If I go back to the BPM process list and then reopen the BPM the option to use variable has changed to user > assigned team. This causes the BPM to fail with the error: The specified user 'urn:sys:group:STB/Marketing_and_Business_Development/Marketing_Team/' does not exist Any ideas? Is this because I am trying to set a team as the authorisation owner? I don't want to use a named person sa if there is an issue and the authorisation task needs re assigning and the owner is away it will cause issues. Variables work fine in the Authorisers section, it is just the owner part I cant get to work.
  13. Hi, Is there any way we can have some better ordering on the Custom PC variable within BPMs? At the moment they are sorted in the order they were created (and I can see why), however when going back and making modifications to older forms it makes it a nightmare to find the custom PC you are looking for. I was thinking maybe sort in alphabetical order with a sub section at the top or bottom for the last 5 newly created PCs
  14. In our change process, when a change is refered back for further information we would like to have a variable or a way to pull the task information into a email to go out to a customer. So when one of out agets refers a change at the moment the information goes into the timeline: Is ther a way to pull this into the email template that goes to the customer to supply more information? Hayley.
  15. With the list of email variables available in the Email Template Editor becoming longer and longer, it would be good if these could be presented in a structured picker UI similar to when using variable/parameters in BPM nodes, rather than the longer scrolling select list. This would also help with ordering of the list, as at the moment the order appears to be when they where added rather than truly alphabetical. Cheers Martyn
  • Create New...